respond-to-referees

Solid

Generate a structured response-to-referees document from a referee report and the revised manuscript. Maps each referee comment to the specific revision, classifies coverage (addressed / partially / deferred / disagreement), and drafts polite but firm responses. Use during the R&R (revise-and-resubmit) stage of paper revision.

Data & Documents 0 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
0
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

<!-- Adapted from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (MIT), https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --> # Respond to Referees Produce a complete response-to-referees document by cross-referencing the referee report against the revised manuscript. Classify every concern, draft a courteous response for each, and flag anything unaddressed before submission. ## Inputs - `$0` — path to the referee report - `$1` — path to the revised manuscript Supported formats and how to read them. In the commands below, `FILE` stands for the input path being converted — either `$0` (referee report) or `$1` (revised manuscript). Always use `mktemp` for the temp file (not a predictable `/tmp/...` name) so paths with spaces and concurrent runs don't collide, and so untrusted `FILE` paths can't clobber other temp files via symlink races. | Format | How to extract text | | --- | --- | | `.tex`, `.qmd`, `.md`, `.txt` | Read directly with the `Read` tool. | | `.pdf` | `TMP=$(mktemp --suffix=.txt) && pdftotext "FILE" "$TMP"` (poppler-utils; use `mktemp -t ...` on macOS if `--suffix` is unsupported). Grep `"$TMP"`. | | `.docx` | `TMP=$(mktemp --suffix=.txt) && pandoc "FILE" -t plain -o "$TMP"` (or `docx2txt "FILE" "$TMP"`). Grep `"$TMP"`. | | `.html` | `TMP=$(mktemp --suffix=.txt) && pandoc "FILE" -t plain -o "$TMP"`. Grep `"$TMP"`. | If a required tool is missing or extraction fails, ask the user to provide a plain-text version (`.txt` or `.md`) and stop. ## Workflow ### Step 0: Co...

Details

Author
groundnuty
Repository
groundnuty/agentic-repo-template
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

referee-response

Draft an R&R response letter to a journal decision, sectioned by role (Senior Editor, Associate Editor, Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2), where every claimed change is located and read in the actual manuscript before a location pin is written, and anything unverifiable becomes a TODO instead of a claim. TRIGGER on "respond to the referees", "draft the R&R response", "write the R2R", "address the reviewer comments", "respond to the AE", "continue the R2R", or when the user pastes reviewer comments, forwards a decision email, or points at a decision-letter PDF. Also owns checking a finished response letter before resubmission ("check the R2R letter before we resubmit"). Writes <project>/R2R_R<n>.tex and never edits the manuscript.

5 Updated today
ericluo04
Data & Documents Featured

revise

Parse peer reviewer comments and generate a structured Response to Reviewers document with tracked manuscript changes. Classifies comments as MAJOR/MINOR/REBUTTAL, coordinates new analyses with /analyze-stats and /make-figures, and produces cover letter for editor.

223 Updated yesterday
Aperivue
Code & Development Listed

review-paper

Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via --peer --stress. Reviews referenced analysis scripts and runs /audit-reproducibility on them unless --no-cross-artifact.

0 Updated today
groundnuty