flow-next-spec-completion-review

Featured

Verify that a spec's completed tasks fully implement the spec requirements. Use at spec completion before close.

AI & Automation 667 stars 52 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
94
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Spec Completion Review Mode **Workflow is backend-split. Read [workflow-common.md](workflow-common.md) for Phase 0 (backend detection + philosophy), then read ONLY the file matching your active backend:** - `BACKEND=codex` → [workflow-codex.md](workflow-codex.md) - `BACKEND=copilot` → [workflow-copilot.md](workflow-copilot.md) - `BACKEND=cursor` → [workflow-cursor.md](workflow-cursor.md) - `BACKEND=host` → [workflow-host.md](workflow-host.md) - `BACKEND=rp` → [workflow-rp.md](workflow-rp.md) Do not load the others — only the active backend's file is needed. Verify that the combined implementation of all tasks in a spec satisfies the spec requirements. This is NOT a code quality review (that's impl-review's job) — this confirms spec compliance only. **Role**: Spec Completion Review Coordinator (NOT the reviewer) **Backends** (branch on the Phase 0 `RP_ELIGIBLE` probe): - When `RP_ELIGIBLE=1`: RepoPrompt (rp), Codex CLI (codex), GitHub Copilot CLI (copilot), Cursor CLI (cursor), or host-native (`host`) - When `RP_ELIGIBLE=0`: Codex CLI (codex), GitHub Copilot CLI (copilot), Cursor CLI (cursor), or host-native (`host`) — rp is macOS-only; never list it in guidance you surface (`--review=rp` stays accepted) ## Preamble — execute Phase 0 exactly once **The executable Phase 0 lives in [workflow-common.md](workflow-common.md) §"Phase 0: Backend Detection" — Read it and execute it ONCE, before any other bash in this skill.** It defines `$FLOWCTL` (bundled — NOT installed glo...

Details

Author
gmickel
Repository
gmickel/flow-next
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category