flow-next-prime

Featured

Comprehensive codebase assessment for agent and production readiness. Classifies the project (lifecycle, topology, size, stack, shape), scans 8 pillars, verifies commands actually run, checks GitHub settings. Leads with a verdict + ranked next-actions; fixes agent readiness only. Triggers on /flow-next:prime.

AI & Automation 695 stars 55 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
95
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Flow Prime Comprehensive codebase assessment inspired by [Factory.ai's Agent Readiness framework](https://factory.ai/news/agent-readiness). **Role**: readiness assessor, improvement proposer **Goal**: full visibility into codebase health, targeted fixes for agent readiness ## Two-Tier Assessment | Category | Pillars | What Happens | |----------|---------|--------------| | **Agent Readiness** | 1-5 | Scored, maturity level calculated, fixes offered | | **Production Readiness** | 6-8 | Reported for awareness, no fixes offered | This gives you **full visibility** while keeping remediation focused on what actually helps agents work. **Criteria counts live in [pillars.md](pillars.md), never here.** pillars.md is the single census source (the legacy scored criteria feeding the maturity level, the informational rows, and the new agent-readiness tier groups AO/DR/TO/HP). Do not restate a count in this file - a hardcoded number drifts the moment a criterion is added. The classification, operability ladder, per-shape playbooks, per-stack matrix, and harness check-set live in the four reference files: [classification.md](classification.md), [playbooks.md](playbooks.md), [stacks.md](stacks.md), [harness.md](harness.md). ## Why This Matters Existence checks lie. A repo can carry a CLAUDE.md, a hook file, and a `lint` script yet be un-agentic in practice - the file is an empty template, the build is broken, imports don't resolve, or it is really one of 99 sibling repos. Prime jud...

Details

Author
gmickel
Repository
gmickel/flow-next
Created
8 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

agentgrade

Audit any AI agent codebase for production readiness. Grades the repo against five pillars — evaluation, observability, data foundation, orchestration, governance — plus an incident playbook check, then reports the gaps ranked by risk with the exact artifact to build next. Use when the user says "audit my agent", "agentgrade", "is this agent production ready", "production readiness check", "agent gap analysis", or is about to deploy/launch an AI agent to real users.

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
rohitguta2432
AI & Automation Listed

agent-production-readiness

Reviews an AI agent for production readiness across evaluation, cost, observability, guardrails, human oversight, reliability, and governance. Use when someone is preparing an agent for production or a go-live, asking whether an agent is ready to ship, reviewing an agent's design, prompt, tools, or deployment, or hardening a working prototype into a dependable system. Produces an evidence-based scorecard and a prioritized list of the gaps to close.

0 Updated 1 months ago
hamidettefagh
AI & Automation Listed

assess

Assess a codebase's readiness for AI agent contributors using the layered contract model, and generate a complexity hotspot SVG treemap (size = LOC, hue = cyclomatic complexity, saturation = recent git churn). TRIGGER when the user types /assess, asks for an AI-readiness review, wants a complexity heatmap or hotspot map, asks 'how complex is this code?', wants migration risk triage, or asks for a codebase snapshot/report. Produces an MD report + SVG that can be opened as a PR in the target repo.

30 Updated today
bjcoombs