verification

Solid

Use when marking a task complete, finishing a feature, or claiming a bug fixed -- verifies functional resolution before closing. Do NOT use for lint/quality checks (use sniper AFTER this).

AI & Automation 25 stars 4 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
47
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

<objective> Verification confirms the original request is actually fulfilled -- distinct from sniper, which only confirms the code is clean. It runs a 6-step process: re-read the original request word for word, list every acceptance criterion (explicit and implicit), verify each with concrete evidence (test output, logs, screenshots, diffs), run the full test suite to check for regressions, review every modified file for accidental side effects, then route the "functionally resolved" claim through the `challenger` agent before writing it down. Step 6 always persists `.claude/apex/docs/verify-{task-slug}.md` -- an in-context "it works" declaration doesn't survive a session boundary, and this artifact is what later gates (sniper, elicitation) actually check. It sits between eLicit and eXamine in APEX: a task is only complete when both verification and sniper pass. </objective> # Verification Before Completion ## Overview **Sniper validates CODE QUALITY. Verification validates FUNCTIONAL RESOLUTION.** Both are needed before closing any task. Sniper catches linter errors, SOLID violations, and code style issues. Verification ensures the **original request is actually fulfilled** -- the right behavior, the right output, the right fix. A task can pass sniper with zero errors and still be functionally wrong. | Aspect | Sniper | Verification | |--------|--------|-------------| | **Focus** | Code quality | Functional correctness | | **Checks** | Linting, SOLID, style | Acceptanc...

Details

Author
fusengine
Repository
fusengine/agents
Created
8 months ago
Last Updated
6 days ago
Language
CSS
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category