scholar-evaluation

Solid

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

AI & Automation 2,210 stars 164 forks Updated 1 weeks ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Scholar Evaluation ## Overview Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly and research work. This skill provides structured evaluation methodology based on peer-reviewed research assessment criteria, enabling comprehensive analysis of academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing across multiple quality dimensions. ## When to Use This Skill Use this skill when: - Evaluating research papers for quality and rigor - Assessing literature review comprehensiveness and quality - Reviewing research methodology design - Scoring data analysis approaches - Evaluating scholarly writing and presentation - Providing structured feedback on academic work - Benchmarking research quality against established criteria - Assessing publication readiness for target venues - Providing quantitative evaluation to complement qualitative peer review ## Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics **When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.** If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams: - Use the **scientific-schematics** skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams - Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language - Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic **For new documents:** Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, w...

Details

Author
foryourhealth111-pixel
Repository
foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

scholar-evaluation

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

26,817 Updated today
K-Dense-AI
AI & Automation Listed

scholar-evaluation

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

0 Updated 2 days ago
fabioc-aloha
Code & Development Listed

scholar-evaluation

Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly and research work. This skill provides structured evaluation methodology based on peer-reviewed research assessment criteria, en...

335 Updated today
aiskillstore
AI & Automation Solid

peer-review

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

2,210 Updated 1 weeks ago
foryourhealth111-pixel
Code & Development Featured

peer-review

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

26,817 Updated today
K-Dense-AI