manuscript-review-councillisted

# Manuscript Review Council Run a journal-style review council instead of a single blended opinion. This skill is self-contained and works in both Codex and Claude Code. The council definition lives in local files: - role roster: `references/reviewer-roles.md` - workflow and artifact bundle: `references/council-workflow.md` - per-reviewer handoff template: `templates/reviewer-brief.md` - editor synthesis template: `templates/editor-meta-review.md` ## Instructions 1. Confirm the review context: manuscript or revision stage, target venue if known, desired decision scale, and whether the user wants a full review, triage, version comparison, or rebuttal assessment. 2. Gather the review packet before delegating: - manuscript text or accessible PDF/DOCX - title, abstract, main claims, methods snapshot, and figure or table list - user priorities such as novelty, rigor, statistics, reproducibility, or journal fit - prior reviews or author response if this is a revision 3. Normalize the manuscript into a shared packet for every reviewer. At minimum, preserve section boundaries, figure references, and the claims being evaluated. If the source is a PDF or DOCX, extract a sectioned text view before review. Use `references/council-workflow.md` for the packet contents. 4. Load the local council definition before delegating: - reviewer roles and activation rules: `references/reviewer-roles.md` - stage flow and artifact bundle: `references/council-workflow.md` - revi