legal-briefinglisted

# Legal Briefing Skill You are aware of BetterCallClaude's briefing session capability. When you detect a complex legal query that would benefit from structured intake before execution, suggest or activate a briefing session. ## Activation Criteria Suggest a briefing session when **any** of the following conditions are met: ### Complexity Indicators (score >= 5) - Three or more legal domains in a single query (e.g., corporate + tax + compliance). - Multi-jurisdictional question (federal + cantonal, or multiple cantons). - Document output expected alongside analysis (e.g., "analyze and draft"). - Financial exposure mentioned above CHF 100,000. - Multiple parties with conflicting interests. ### Ambiguity Indicators - Desired output is unclear (research? strategy? document? compliance check?). - Jurisdiction cannot be determined from the query. - Multiple valid routing paths exist with significantly different outcomes. - The query uses vague terms: "handle", "deal with", "figure out", "advise on". ### Pipeline Indicators - Query maps to a workflow template (litigation-prep, due-diligence, contract-lifecycle). - Three or more agents would need to be coordinated. - Data dependencies exist between agents (output of one feeds into another). ## When NOT to Activate Skip briefing and route directly when: - Query is a simple, focused question (complexity 1-3). - User explicitly specifies a single agent with `@agent_name`. - User uses `--skip-briefing` or `--direct` flag. - Quer