contracts-cognition
SolidUse when reading a contract for risk and constraint — clause shape, redline priority, what the contract actually binds. Triggers on 'review this contract', 'what does this MSA constrain'.
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- event4u-app
- Repository
- event4u-app/agent-config
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
legal-compliance-contract-review
Produces a structured first-pass contract review: a clause inventory against the expected set for the contract type, non-standard terms flagged against the supplied playbook, missing provisions listed as absences, and every issue risk-graded with a proposed position — while never asserting a legal conclusion the supplied text does not support. Use when reviewing an inbound contract, comparing a counterparty's redlines to a fallback position, checking what is missing from a draft, triaging a queue of agreements, or preparing a summary for a qualified reviewer. Trigger on 'review this contract', 'check this MSA', 'what's missing from this agreement', 'redline', 'non-standard clause', 'NDA review', 'supplier agreement', 'terms and conditions review'. Not for drafting an internal policy or standard (use legal-compliance-policy-drafting) or for assessing a new rule's effect across the business (use legal-compliance-regulatory-change-impact).
review-contract
Clause-by-clause contract review — inventories key clauses (term, termination, liability cap, indemnity, IP, payment, confidentiality, governing law, auto-renewal), flags deviations from market-standard positions with RED/YELLOW/GREEN severity and verbatim quotes, drafts redline language, and sets negotiation priority. Use when the user says 'review this contract', 'what's wrong with this MSA', 'can we sign this as-is', or pastes any agreement for analysis.
clause-checklist-en
A clause checklist for a single contract - walks the contract against 41 clause categories (the CUAD taxonomy) and marks each one present / absent / risky, so the clause that should be there but is missing does not slip through. Extractive (quotes the contract, does not paraphrase). Common-law native, jurisdiction-neutral framing. Different from a bulk audit - this goes deep on one contract and asks "what is missing and what bites here". Pairs with adversarial-legal-review-en and reviewer-en. Use when: "check the clauses in this contract", "what is missing from this agreement", "clause spotting", "contract checklist", "review a single contract", "which clauses are risky" - before signing, in negotiation, or in DD of one contract.