contracts-cognition

Solid

Use when reading a contract for risk and constraint — clause shape, redline priority, what the contract actually binds. Triggers on 'review this contract', 'what does this MSA constrain'.

AI & Automation 10 stars 1 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
35
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# contracts-cognition ## When to use - A draft MSA / DPA / SOW / vendor contract / partner agreement lands and a non-lawyer needs to read it for *what it actually constrains*, *which clauses carry real risk*, and *what to redline first*. - An existing contract is being renegotiated; the question is *which clauses are now misshapen* given current scale, regulatory regime, or customer mix. - A new customer contract triggers obligations (SLA, indemnity, audit, data-handling) that need to be sized against operational capacity before signing. Do NOT use as a substitute for actual legal counsel (this skill produces the *non-lawyer cognition* that prepares the conversation with counsel, not the legal opinion), for privacy-specific review (route to `privacy-review` (P6); this skill composes P6 for data clauses), or for contract management software / e-signature operations. ## Cognition cluster - **Mental model 28 — Inversion.** *"What would force us to invoke this clause? What would force the counterparty to invoke it?"* Inversion surfaces which clauses are dormant boilerplate vs which are loaded triggers. See [`mental-models.md`](../../../docs/contracts/mental-models.md) § 28. - **Mental model 21 — Second-order thinking.** Each clause has a second-order shape: indemnity caps interact with insurance coverage; SLAs interact with operating-cost; auto-renewal interacts with switching cost. Reading clauses in isolation misses the load-bearing combinations. See `mental-models.md` § 2...

Details

Author
event4u-app
Repository
event4u-app/agent-config
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

legal-compliance-contract-review

Produces a structured first-pass contract review: a clause inventory against the expected set for the contract type, non-standard terms flagged against the supplied playbook, missing provisions listed as absences, and every issue risk-graded with a proposed position — while never asserting a legal conclusion the supplied text does not support. Use when reviewing an inbound contract, comparing a counterparty's redlines to a fallback position, checking what is missing from a draft, triaging a queue of agreements, or preparing a summary for a qualified reviewer. Trigger on 'review this contract', 'check this MSA', 'what's missing from this agreement', 'redline', 'non-standard clause', 'NDA review', 'supplier agreement', 'terms and conditions review'. Not for drafting an internal policy or standard (use legal-compliance-policy-drafting) or for assessing a new rule's effect across the business (use legal-compliance-regulatory-change-impact).

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
alihusains
Code & Development Listed

review-contract

Clause-by-clause contract review — inventories key clauses (term, termination, liability cap, indemnity, IP, payment, confidentiality, governing law, auto-renewal), flags deviations from market-standard positions with RED/YELLOW/GREEN severity and verbatim quotes, drafts redline language, and sets negotiation priority. Use when the user says 'review this contract', 'what's wrong with this MSA', 'can we sign this as-is', or pastes any agreement for analysis.

15 Updated 2 days ago
alebgl77
AI & Automation Listed

clause-checklist-en

A clause checklist for a single contract - walks the contract against 41 clause categories (the CUAD taxonomy) and marks each one present / absent / risky, so the clause that should be there but is missing does not slip through. Extractive (quotes the contract, does not paraphrase). Common-law native, jurisdiction-neutral framing. Different from a bulk audit - this goes deep on one contract and asks "what is missing and what bites here". Pairs with adversarial-legal-review-en and reviewer-en. Use when: "check the clauses in this contract", "what is missing from this agreement", "clause spotting", "contract checklist", "review a single contract", "which clauses are risky" - before signing, in negotiation, or in DD of one contract.

0 Updated 3 weeks ago
matematicsolutions