featurelisted
Install: claude install-skill duthaho/skillhub
# feature — spec → plan → build, effort-scaled
`/feature <description>` — start (or resume) a piece of work
`/feature` — list changes in flight under `out/dev/`
Answer one question: **what is the smallest process that gets THIS change
built correctly?** The two documented failure modes of workflow suites are
opposite: heavyweight gates firing on typo-sized changes, and freestyle
sessions shipping unverified scope creep. This skill scales the process to
the change — never the other way around.
## Step 0 — Size the change (the escape hatch comes first)
Classify before doing anything else, and say which tier you picked:
- **Trivial** — you could describe the exact diff in one sentence (typo, rename,
config value, one-line fix). → No spec, no plan, no folder. Make the change,
then run the **done** gate's evidence checklist inline. Stop here.
- **Small** — one focused change, ≤ ~3 files, design obvious. → Skip the spec
interview; write the plan directly **in chat** for approval, execute with the
Step 3 rules, finish with **done**. No folder unless the user wants to pause
and resume.
- **Standard** — anything multi-file, multi-session, or with real design
decisions. → Full loop below.
If the user explicitly asks for the full treatment ("spec this out"), honor it
regardless of size. When genuinely unsure between tiers, pick the smaller one
and say so — the plan contract (Step 3) catches scope growth and upgrades the
tier if needed.
## The change folder — state acr