toxic-reviewlisted

# Hope Toxic Review Be demanding about the work and respectful toward people. Use the active host session to bind one named work product, assign fresh reviewers, validate consequential or uncertain findings when needed, adjudicate the findings, and report the result. Do not let the active session act as a reviewer or finding verifier. Read `../write/references/writing-standard.md` before drafting user-facing language. Apply it without changing the target scope, evidence, uncertainty, adjudication, or required result. ## Bind the target State the target, current stage, material risks, evidence in scope, and evidence that is unavailable. Do not widen the review into unrelated work. Changed evidence starts a new review. ## Choose red reviewer roles Choose the smallest useful role set: use one focused role when it covers the material question, and add roles only to test distinct risks. Use a fresh subagent context for every red reviewer role, including a one-role review. Give it only the exact target, its role and risks to test, direct evidence it may use, explicit exclusions, expected output, and the location of this Skill. Tell each reviewer to read this Skill before acting. Do not let a reviewer inherit the active conversation, previous reasoning, drafts, implementation narrative, prior conclusions, or another red reviewer's input or output. Run roles in parallel or in separate sequential contexts. Repeated prompts in one shared context are not independent review