cf-advise
SolidDecision advisory through a structured interview — never writes code or plans. Use when the user wants help DECIDING, not building — e.g. "should I", "is X worth it", "which approach", "help me decide between A and B", "does it make sense to", "am I overthinking this", "what would you recommend", "is this a good idea", "pros and cons of". Interviews one question at a time to surface hidden requirements, then delivers a verdict-first recommendation with pitfalls and ranked alternatives. Unlike $cf-plan (writes an implementation plan / builds), this only advises. Unlike $cf-ask (looks up how existing code works), this reasons about a decision.
Install
Quality Score: 78/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- dinhanhthi
- Repository
- dinhanhthi/coding-friend
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 days ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
mkadvise
Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).
plastic-agent-advisor
Consult the advisor for expensive reasoning: one-way doors, plans, adversarial review of a plan or conclusion before an irreversible step, a deadlock after two failed attempts, or ranking several plausible options. Use when the user asks for a second opinion, a hard design decision, an architecture review, help breaking a deadlock, or says "ask the advisor". Also sets which advisor is the default when asked ("make Fable my advisor", "switch my advisor", "use the real advisor").
ask-the-council
Convenes a panel of opinionated advisors (parallel Claude subagents, each with a distinct mandate and a forbidden move so they genuinely diverge), then a Chairman synthesis that COMMITS to one recommendation with explicit tradeoffs. Use proactively for any high-stakes design, architecture, or tradeoff decision where credible options genuinely compete. Also on "ask the council", "the council", "get a panel". Not for fact-finding or decisions with one obvious answer — answer those directly.