claude-strategy-reviewlisted

# Claude Strategy Review Independent adversarial logic review using Claude Code, pinned to `claude-opus-5` with `--effort max`, `--tools default`, and `--permission-mode auto`. ## Focus Use this to stress-test a strategy, argument, proposal, research conclusion, risk framework, optimizer design, decision memo, or any other plan where the question is "does this logic hold up?" The generic review checks: - conclusions that do not follow from premises - hidden, circular, fragile, or unstated assumptions - made-up thresholds, constants, weights, or scoring rules - missing evidence, counterexamples, and falsification tests - incorrect math, units, base rates, or time horizons - feasibility, incentives, adoption, and operational constraints - downside, tail risks, failure modes, monitoring, and reversibility - contradictions between goals, constraints, and proposed mechanisms ## Personas Personas are optional lenses, not a fixed enum. The runner discovers persona markdown files through the shared persona registry. Examples include `quant`, `pm`, `brent`, `architect`, `red-team`, `marcus`, or a direct persona file. If the user provides personas, use them. If the user asks for a panel or persona lenses without naming them, ask one concise question about which lenses to include. Otherwise run the generic logic review by default. List discovered personas with: ```bash python3 ~/.codex/skills/claude-strategy-review/scripts/claude_strategy_review.py \ --list-personas ``` ##