think-tank

Solid

Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.

Web & Frontend 27,705 stars 2858 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Virtual Think Tank A pre-planning skill that simulates a moderated expert debate to surface trade-offs, blind spots, and perspectives before committing to a plan. Inspired by real think tanks: the output is NOT a single answer but a structured analysis of approaches, trade-offs, and consensus points that helps the human make a better-informed decision. ## Why This Exists When facing architectural, strategic, or design decisions, a single perspective (even a well-informed one) tends to gravitate toward conventional wisdom and miss important trade-offs. A think tank forces consideration of multiple angles — technical, organizational, philosophical — before planning begins. The result is plans that account for more of reality. ## How It Works The think tank uses **multiple personas debating within a single context** — not separate agents. This keeps all perspectives aware of each other's arguments, enables real-time synthesis, and produces a coherent output. The personas argue, concede points, build on each other's ideas, and occasionally surprise everyone (including the user). ## Running the Think Tank ### Phase 1: Frame the Decision Before assembling the panel, clearly understand what's being decided. Ask the user (if not already clear): 1. **What is the decision or problem?** (e.g., "monolith vs microservices for a new e-commerce platform") 2. **What constraints exist?** (team size, timeline, budget, existing systems, regulatory) 3. **What's already been tried or c...

Details

Author
davila7
Repository
davila7/claude-code-templates
Created
11 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

thinking-partner

A deterministic thinking partner that challenges assumptions and applies mental models to sharpen decisions, solve problems, and think more clearly. Use this skill whenever a user says "help me think through X", "challenge my thinking", "what am I missing", "apply mental models to this", "play devil's advocate", "stress test this idea", "poke holes in my plan", "help me decide between X and Y", "what are the second-order effects", "I'm stuck on a decision", names any specific model (SWOT, first principles, inversion, pre-mortem, etc.), or asks for structured reasoning on any ambiguous, high-stakes, or complex problem. Also trigger when the user seems uncertain, is rationalizing, or is asking "am I thinking about this right?" Even casual phrases like "what do you think about..." on non-trivial topics should trigger this skill.

2 Updated today
mortiebiennial49
AI & Automation Listed

shipkit-thinking-partner

Use when user needs to think through decisions, explore trade-offs, or challenge assumptions. Triggers: 'think with me', 'help me decide', 'what am I missing?', 'devil's advocate', 'pre-mortem'.

1 Updated today
stefan-stepzero
AI & Automation Listed

debate-agents

Runs a problem through multiple expert perspectives via debate (agents argue in rounds and converge) or poll (agents analyze independently, then aggregate by consensus). Use to pressure-test a decision or trade-off with no clear winner. Standalone, or invoked by another skill as a sub-routine. Not for implementation (use architect-system) or code verification (use review-work).

10 Updated today
hungv47
Code & Development Listed

think

Use before planning when you need strategic clarity — product discovery, scope decisions, premise validation. Applies YC-grade product thinking to challenge assumptions and find the smallest starting point. Supports --autopilot to run the full sprint automatically after approval. Use --retro after a sprint to reflect on what shipped. Triggers on /think, /office-hours, /ceo-review.

0 Updated today
Jihadyip286
Code & Development Featured

consciousness-council

Run a multi-perspective Mind Council deliberation on any question, decision, or creative challenge. Use this skill whenever the user wants diverse viewpoints, needs help making a tough decision, asks for a council/panel/board discussion, wants to explore a problem from multiple angles, requests devil's advocate analysis, or says things like "what would different experts think about this", "help me think through this from all sides", "council mode", "mind council", or "deliberate on this". Also trigger when the user faces a dilemma, trade-off, or complex choice with no obvious answer.

26,817 Updated today
K-Dense-AI