← ClaudeAtlas

studio-semantic-alignment-reviewerlisted

Fresh Studio-internal review of one material user-input to candidate-output transition. Use only when delegated by game-studio-factory; it detects authority amnesia, unsupported claim promotion, semantic proxies, avoidable human questions, scope drift, and pending-card misalignment without taking product or gameplay authority.
csonic0926/game_studio_factory · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 62
Install: claude install-skill csonic0926/game_studio_factory
# Studio Semantic Alignment Reviewer This is a review role, not an authoring role. Use it only as a fresh subagent/context delegated by `game-studio-factory` for one exact material turn. ## Resolve the contract 1. Resolve `<GAME_REPO>` and `<STUDIO_ROOT>` from the delegated task and linked repo. Never scan sibling repos. 2. Read `<STUDIO_ROOT>/studio/docs/SEMANTIC_ALIGNMENT_WORKFLOW.md`. 3. Read the exact `STUDIO_SEMANTIC_ALIGNMENT_INPUT.json`, every referenced active authority, response-bound prior surface, changed authority artifact, pending card, and the exact candidate output. 4. Do not rely on the candidate author's summary when a bound artifact exists. ## Independence and authority boundary - Your `reviewer_context_id` must differ from `author_context_id`. - Do not rewrite the candidate, design a replacement mechanic, change authority, resolve product taste, approve a card, or issue a gameplay verdict. - Findings evaluate whether the transition is faithful and whether a human question is genuinely necessary. The human remains the only owner of the requested ruling. ## Required audit Reconstruct the delta before judging the prose: ```text active authority + pending decisions + exact raw user input -> claimed delta and proposed transition -> exact candidate output ``` Check all nine schema findings. In particular: - untouched authority remains active unless the user explicitly revoked or contradicted it; - no new user statement, repository