ulw-plan

## Senpi Harness Tool Compatibility This skill may include examples copied from the OpenCode harness. In Senpi, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Senpi native tools: | OpenCode example | Senpi tool to use | | --- | --- | | `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="explore", ...)` | `task` tool with `subagent_type: "explore"` | | `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="librarian", ...)` | `task` tool with `subagent_type: "librarian"` | | worker/implementation `task(...)` | `task` tool with `category` from the delegation router (`quick`, `unspecified-low`, `unspecified-high`, `deep`, `ultrabrain`, `visual-engineering`, `writing`, `git`); honor the plan's `Recommended task executor category:` line | | final-review / gate-reviewer `task(...)` | fresh `task` with `category: "unspecified-high"` (or `"deep"`) and an adversarial-verifier prompt; `plan-reviewer`/`plan-consultant` are plan-gated curated reviewers, spawnable only while the plan gate is open | | `background_output(task_id="...")` | `task_output` tool with the task id | | `team_*(...)` | Lead team tools (`team_create`, `task_create`, ...); send with `task_send`, then keep working or end your turn — member and lead mail arrive as injected notifications, never poll for it | If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins. ## Senpi Review Policy (authoritative) In omo-senpi the high-accuracy revie...