ulw-loop

Solid

Goal-like loop that uses ultrawork mode to decompose work into systematic, evidence-bound steps.

AI & Automation 61,980 stars 5021 forks Updated today NOASSERTION

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# ulw-loop Use this skill when the user asks for `ulw-loop`, `ulw`, durable goal execution, evidence-led work, manual QA, or checkpointed long-running delivery. This skill is intentionally compact. The full workflow lives in `references/full-workflow.md`. Read only the sections needed for the current phase, then execute them exactly. ## Required First Steps 1. Open `references/full-workflow.md`. 2. Read through **Bootstrap** (including its tier triage), **Execution Loop**, and the **Manual-QA channels** table before running any ULW command or recording evidence. 3. If the task has code edits, tests, QA, or commit work, follow the full workflow's delegation and evidence rules. Tests alone never prove done. ## Non-Negotiables - Use the ulw-loop CLI state under `.omo/ulw-loop`; do not hand-edit goal state. - After any compaction or context loss, re-read brief + goals + ledger FIRST (`omo sparkshell cat .omo/ulw-loop/ledger.jsonl` or read directly) plus `omo ulw-loop status --json`, then resume; never re-plan from scratch. - If `omo ulw-loop create-goals` says the existing aggregate is already complete, start unrelated new work with a fresh `--session-id <new-id>` instead of steering or forcing the completed default state. Use `--force` only to intentionally overwrite completed evidence. - Every success criterion needs observable evidence from a real surface: a channel (tmux, HTTP, browser, computer-use) or, for CLI- or data-shaped criteria, an auxiliary surface (CLI stdout...

Details

Author
code-yeongyu
Repository
code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
NOASSERTION

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category