eng-consultlisted

# /eng-consult Convene a multi-voice engineering consulting panel that reviews code artifacts for quality, security, DevOps readiness, usability, and architectural fitness. Each specialist independently reviews the artifact, then leadership triages findings into a structured remediation plan. This is a **consulting** exercise. The panel returns recommendations. The operator decides what ships. No verdicts, no rulings, no advisory-tier semantics — just a structured second opinion across multiple engineering disciplines. --- ## When to Use Call this when you want a thorough multi-discipline review: - Pre-release review of a module, script, or PR - Full codebase audit before a wider release or beta - Targeted security, quality, or deployment readiness review - Onboarding new contributors to a well-documented codebase This is not for quick questions. Convening the panel means you want the full treatment across multiple engineering disciplines simultaneously. **Decision tree — which tool?** - "Is this code good enough to ship?" → `/eng-consult` - "How would someone break this?" → `/infosec-rt` - "Quick cross-CLI review of the staged diff" → `/review` (single-Reviewer pass, not a panel) --- ## Tools to invoke This skill produces commentary. It does not replace the deterministic gates. Before or during a session, the operator (or the skill itself) may run: - `scripts/gates.sh secrets | deps | sast` — gitleaks, osv-scanner, semgrep - `scripts/gates.sh review` — cross-CLI s