verify-bidirectional

Solid

A skill that immediately updates the baseline and reflects it in the next session when the user raises a counter-argument to an AI recommendation. Triggered by "is that right?", "re-examine this", "something seems off here". Explicit /verify-bidirectional call also possible.

AI & Automation 14 stars 1 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
39
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# verify-bidirectional — Bidirectional Self-Validation Automation Automates the processing procedure for bidirectional self-validation. Three stages: user counter-argument → baseline update → next session reflection. ## Trigger Conditions Immediately **after** this harness AI recommendation/agreement/decision is committed, when the user raises a refinement challenge: 1. **Proposition refinement**: "isn't it more like..." / "I'd say..." / "what about this" / "what's the root?" 2. **Baseline grep trigger**: User cross-references own assets, memory, CLAUDE.md rules, past decisions 3. **Meta-level trigger**: "if you have objections" / "double-check" / "essence" / "root cause" 4. **Side validation result**: User runs independent tools (`/skills` · `gh` · external fetch) → catches mismatch with this harness AI hypothesis ### Natural Language Triggers (works without internal vocabulary) Also triggered in external user environments by these natural language phrases: | Phrase | Intent | |---|---| | "is that right?", "re-examine this" | Request AI recommendation re-validation | | "something seems off", "this doesn't feel right" | Counter-argument / refinement | | "I think you said something different before" | Catch inconsistency with past decisions | | "can you be more precise?" | Proposition refinement trigger | | "what's your basis?", "why do you think that?" | Baseline grep trigger | | "check that one more time" | Self-validation request | ### 🟥 5. Prescriptive doctrine st...

Details

Author
chrono-meta
Repository
chrono-meta/forge-harness
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

ref-sp-agents-verification-discipline

Portable verification discipline that counters jumping to answers, sycophancy, and overconfidence: enumerate candidate approaches or root causes, route verification by confidence and stakes, prune on evidence, abstain explicitly when nothing can settle a claim. Use when: choosing between approaches or root causes, acting on an unverified claim or assumption, responding when the user challenges or contradicts a conclusion, deciding how much verification a risky or irreversible action needs, or calibrating stated confidence in answers, reviews, and reports.

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
swiftpostlabs
AI & Automation Listed

double-check

Use whenever the user asks to double-check, cross-check, verify, recheck, sanity-check, or confirm prior analysis or results — including "are you sure", "are you confident", "is this true", "still true?", "prove it", "triple check", "check against" some artifact, "look again", "repeat the analysis", or "repeat your findings in full". Re-derives the answer from source artifacts and returns it standalone in the original request's structure — never a revision log of the prior turn. Also invoke before re-running any analysis whose output the user has already seen once. To repair a chat where a diff-shaped answer already happened, use the `double-check-align` skill.

2 Updated 1 months ago
tony
AI & Automation Listed

bs-check

Use before telling a client or stakeholder "this is fixed", before deploying changes to a production site or service, before activating or modifying a live automation/workflow, before claiming an integration works end-to-end, before quoting pricing or API behavior in a comparison, or before running a destructive infrastructure command. Also use when the user says "confidence check", "how confident are you", "validate this", "pressure-test this", "/bs-check", or whenever a confident-sounding claim has not been directly validated by a query, observation, comparison, or quotable source. ALSO covers design-time reasoning audits via subcommands - "bs-check premise" (are we solving the right problem? premise acceptance - Socratic + Steelman), "bs-check approach" (did we commit too fast? - Burden of Proof, Cold Start, Alternatives, Pre-mortem), "bs-check fresh" (all 9 patterns, fresh-context sub-agent). Trigger phrases for those - challenge this, push back, devil's advocate, poke holes, steelman this, are we solving

0 Updated 1 months ago
GemSpecter