steel-quench
SolidAll-angle verification meta-skill for near-complete artifacts. Turns vague design anxiety into structured challenger waves using fh-commons:quench-challenger, then drives defense and convergence until root weaknesses, residual risks, and added complexity are explicit. Covers standard attack/defense rounds, optional Meta-Aware Adversary mode for AI-specific risks such as hallucination, context collapse, prompt injection, and tool lock-in, and Wave-P3 re-attack after an upstream gate declares PASS. Built-in outputs emphasize attack-plus-prescription pairs and can feed fh-meta:persona-innovator after convergence. Triggered by: "quench this", "devil's judgment", "all-angle review", "end-to-end verification", "steel quench", "deep pre-completion inspection", "did it really pass?".
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- chrono-meta
- Repository
- chrono-meta/forge-harness
- Created
- 3 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
phantom-quench
Input-tracing grounding audit for artifacts such as test cases, analysis reports, and design docs. Extracts proper nouns, numbers, citations, version claims, and branching conditions, then back-traces each to declared local files by grep or to external sources by fetch-and-support checks. Marks missing anchors as Phantom Claims and cited-but-unsupporting anchors as Unsupported. A claim is grounded only by non-model evidence: a local hit or literal source span, never another model's agreement. Renamed from source-grounding-audit; old-name references still route here. Triggered by: "phantom detection", "phantom claim", "source back-trace", "where did this come from", "verify source", "does the source support this claim", "grounding audit", "source grounding audit", "citation support check".
shatterpoint
Adversarially take apart an idea, plan, architecture, pitch, or decision before time or money goes into it: build the strongest version of it, find the load-bearing assumption, stress it until it holds or breaks, run a pre-mortem, deliver a verdict, and name the cheapest disconfirming test. An interrogation (one question per round), not a feedback list. Intensity is selectable: soft|normal|brutal. Use this skill when the user says: 'tear it apart', 'shatter this', 'stress-test this', 'red team this', 'poke holes in this', 'play devil's advocate', 'be brutally honest', 'what's wrong with this', 'pre-mortem', 'challenge my assumptions', 'is this a good idea', 'talk me out of it' — or when a plan, concept, or venture is presented for judgment and the user clearly wants resistance rather than agreement. Do NOT use for code review hunting bugs (that's /code-review) or for over-engineering review.
devils-advocate
Challenges AI-generated plans, code, and designs via pre-mortem, inversion, and Socratic questioning to surface blind spots and failure modes. Triggers on: "challenge this", "devils advocate", "stress test this plan", "poke holes in this", "what am I missing".