deliberation
SolidMulti-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- chrono-meta
- Repository
- chrono-meta/forge-harness
- Created
- 3 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
deliberate
Use when about to throw a substantive decision back at the user as a multiple-choice question, when the user has explicitly delegated the choice ("you decide", "you pick", "i aint picking", "stop asking me to choose", "just do it"), when a craft / strategy / architecture / design / project decision involves competing pressures requiring synthesis, or any time multiple equally-defensible paths exist and the right answer requires deliberation rather than information retrieval. Three-agent sequential loop (Opinion-Drafter → Goal-Auditor → Impact-Maximizer) iterates until convergence, then issues a single recommendation. Skip for trivial mechanical tasks (file ops, format conversions, single-fact lookups, information requests). Auto-fires before any clarifying question that asks the user to pick between substantive options.
dialectic-brainstorming
Brainstorm a consequential, no-ground-truth question with a panel of diverse minds, then resolve it dialectically. A casting step derives orthogonal thinking-axes for the question (each a quality to maximize) and casts one persona per axis; the personas propose and cross-critique concrete candidates while a neutral Synthesizer prunes, recombines across axes, and holds a frontier — returning a short list, not one winner. Use for naming (products, tools, projects), positioning, or any choice of consequence with no objectively correct answer where you want many genuinely different perspectives, not one. Triggers: /dialectic-brainstorming, "brainstorm this with a diverse panel", "what should we name…", "give me a shortlist from multiple perspectives".
council
4-voice parallel deliberation (Architect · Skeptic · Pragmatist · Critic) for architecture, tech selection, or design decisions with no clear answer. Anti-anchoring: each voice gets independent context. Records decision in harness-mem.