deliberation
SolidMulti-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.
Install
Quality Score: 79/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- chrono-meta
- Repository
- chrono-meta/forge-harness
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
debate
Stage a structured multi-round adversarial debate between the active primary and the reviewer on a binary or near-binary proposition. Each side is assigned (or self-selects) an opposing position and defends it through openings, rebuttals, and an optional closing round; the agent then steps out of advocacy and synthesizes a verdict for the user. Use when the user says "debate this with the reviewer," "argue both sides," "steelman both positions," "play devil's advocate with the reviewer," "the active primary vs the reviewer on X," "have the reviewer argue the other side," or "make the case against." Also offer this proactively when the user is leaning hard one way on a high-stakes binary choice and a structured opposing case would stress-test the conviction better than a polite second opinion would.
adjudicator-synthesis
Use when you have run 2 or more agent-council deliberator skills on the same artifact (Skeptic, Voice & Identity, Evidence & Calibration, Strategy & Stakes) and want their structured critiques synthesized into a single SHIP / REVISE / HOLD verdict with a concrete revision brief. Encodes the Adjudicator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. The Adjudicator does not produce a new critique — it produces the decision document the operator acts on.
decision-council
Forces 5 AI advisor personas to argue about a decision, anonymously peer-review each other, and synthesize a verdict with anti-false-consensus guardrails. Auto-detects high-stakes decisions from context. Trigger on: pricing, deal terms, partnerships, market entry, investments, exit strategies, go/no-go calls, trading decisions, DeFi/protocol entry, market entry/exit, futures positions, training program changes, competition prep, injury decisions, career moves, big purchases, financial planning, macro economic events (central-bank decisions, FX, inflation), geopolitical developments affecting markets, major AI/Web3/tech releases that change capability or competitive landscape, or any question where being wrong costs money, health, or reputation. Also trigger on "run council", "stress test", "what am I missing", "devil's advocate", "sanity check", or when the user leans toward an answer already. Do NOT trigger for brainstorming, writing, code, factual lookups, routine daily choices, or low-stakes ops.