apex-review

Solid

Reviews a technical proposal from the perspective of organizational decision-makers (CTO, technical lead, QA lead, conference reviewers, etc.) and generates an HTML presentation deck. Outputs approval gate results per persona and connects to sim-conductor for improvement suggestions.

AI & Automation 8 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 79/100

Stars 20%
32
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# apex-review — Decision-Maker Review Layer > Reviews proposals from the perspective of **top-level organizational decision-makers**, not field practitioners. > Technically excellent and "this person will approve it" are different things. **Role distinction from hub-persona-auditor** - hub-persona-auditor: Validates **reader comprehension** of a finished asset (reading experience) - apex-review: Evaluates **decision-maker approval likelihood** of a technical proposal (decision-making experience) --- ## Triggers - `/apex-review` - "Will this work for the decision-maker?", "Will the CTO approve this?", "What do I need to present to the team lead?" - "Review from an executive perspective", "Generate presentation slides" (when decision-maker audience is specified) - When agent-composer identifies a task requiring a decision-maker approval gate - "Check this before I report to my manager" - "Does this look convincing?" - "Find objections they might raise in advance" - "Review before the executive briefing" - "Do you think this will pass?" --- ## Built-in Decision-Maker Personas | Code | Role | Core Evaluation Criteria | Auto-Reject Triggers | |:---:|---|---|---| | `CTO` | Chief Technology Officer | Strategic alignment · competitive advantage · tech vision | "Everyone else is already doing this" / "Feels like a personal project" | | `TD` | Technical Lead / Team Lead | Implementation risk · team capability · operational burden · cost | Vague timelines / conflicts with existi...

Details

Author
chrono-meta
Repository
chrono-meta/forge-harness
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

adversarial-reviewer

Devil's advocate code review with three adversarial personas that challenge assumptions and find hidden issues. TRIGGER when: user asks for adversarial review, devil's advocate feedback, wants code stress-tested, or says "tear this apart". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants a standard code review, quick feedback, or style-only review.

1 Updated 1 weeks ago
DROOdotFOO
AI & Automation Solid

doc-review

Use when the user asks to review or critique a prose planning document — a plan, spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design doc.

33 Updated today
OutlineDriven
AI & Automation Featured

apm-review-panel

Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. The panel fans out to five mandatory specialists plus a test-coverage specialist (active on every PR that touches src/) plus three conditional specialists (auth, doc-writer, performance-expert), all running in their own agent threads, and a CEO synthesizer. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE recommendation comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes follow-ups, and renders a ship-recommendation that the maintainer and author weigh. Activate when a non-trivial PR needs a cross-cutting recommendation (architecture, CLI logging, DevX UX, supply-chain security, growth/positioning, optionally auth, docs, perf, and test coverage, with CEO arbitration).

3,379 Updated yesterday
microsoft