← ClaudeAtlas

design-smell-reviewlisted

Lightweight design smell review for modules and APIs—coupling, cohesion, naming, boundaries, and unnecessary complexity. Use before large refactors or when code feels hard to change. Complements gstack/review (diff-focused).
charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill · ★ 16 · AI & Automation · score 79
Install: claude install-skill charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill
# Design smell review ## Scope Review **structure and boundaries**, not line-by-line style. Pair with PR diff review for changes; use this for module-level health. ## Smell checklist | Smell | Signal | Direction | |-------|--------|-----------| | God module | Many unrelated responsibilities | Split by domain | | Shotgun surgery | One change touches many files | Consolidate logic | | Feature envy | Module A mostly uses B's data | Move behavior | | Leaky abstraction | Impl details escape API | Narrow public surface | | Config soup | Magic strings everywhere | Named constants / schema | | Boolean flags | `if is_x` branches everywhere | Polymorphism or strategy | ## Workflow 1. Map **entry points** and **dependencies** (imports, public API). 2. List **responsibilities** per module; flag >1 unrelated core job. 3. Check **testability** — can core logic run without I/O? 4. Propose **smallest** structural improvement (not full rewrite). 5. Record decision in ADR if trade-off is significant. ## Output format ```text ## Summary [1-2 sentences] ## Smells (priority order) 1. [Smell] — evidence — suggested fix (effort: S/M/L) ## Recommended next step [One concrete change to try first] ``` ## Simplification (Chesterton's Fence) Before deleting or collapsing code, ask **why it exists**: - Comment, test, or git history explaining constraint? - If unknown, prefer small experiment or question over bulk delete. - Remove duplication only when behavior is proven identical. - "Fewer l