← ClaudeAtlas

tdd-alignmentlisted

Use this skill at SOP Step 2 to verify and align a Technical Design Document (TDD) with the final PRD: checks every PRD-stated acceptance criterion has a corresponding test/verification approach, every named stage in PRD has a TDD validation strategy, and every L3/L4 data field has a desensitization / audit step planned. Produces an alignment report and inserts patches into TDD where gaps exist. Chinese trigger examples: "TDD 对齐", "TDD 验收对齐", "测试设计对齐 PRD", "Step 2". Do NOT use for unit-test writing (use during Step 9), code-level design review (Step 8), or when TDD is missing entirely (escalate to author). Success = TDD covers 100% of PRD acceptance criteria with named test strategies; PHI handling addressed; staging tests defined.
charliehzm/medharness · ★ 101 · Testing & QA · score 81
Install: claude install-skill charliehzm/medharness
# TDD Alignment (Step 2) ## Core mental model The TDD is the bridge between *what* (PRD) and *how-to-test* (later steps). Misalignment here propagates downstream: an acceptance criterion with no test design becomes an acceptance criterion with no test, becomes a feature shipped without proof. ## What it produces `TDD_ALIGNMENT.md` with: - Coverage table: each PRD acceptance criterion → TDD test strategy - PHI handling table: each L3/L4 field → desensitization step in TDD - Stage validation table: each PRD stage → TDD's stage-level test plan - Gaps list (sorted by severity) ## Active context bundle **Always load first** 1. This `SKILL.md` 2. Final PRD 3. Submitted TDD 4. `COMPLIANCE_TAG.md` (PHI field list) **Load on demand** - `reference/test-strategy-catalog.md` (unit / integration / e2e / chaos / compliance / replay) ## Workflow 1. Extract PRD acceptance criteria into a flat list (numbered). 2. For each criterion, find the TDD section that addresses it; record (criterion → tdd-section + test-strategy). 3. Any criterion without a target → gap. 4. For every L3/L4 field in COMPLIANCE_TAG, locate desensitization plan in TDD; missing → gap. 5. For every PRD stage, locate the corresponding TDD stage validation; missing → gap. 6. Emit report; if gaps exist, suggest concrete TDD patches. ## Hard gate checklist - [ ] 100% of PRD criteria covered (no gaps) - [ ] Every L3/L4 field has desensitization step named in TDD - [ ] Each PRD stage has corresponding TDD stage validation -