scholar-review

Solid

Systematic academic paper review workflow covering self-review before submission and rebuttal writing after receiving reviewer feedback. Triggers on "review paper", "self-review", "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "analyze review comments", "paper review".

AI & Automation 482 stars 62 forks Updated today

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 87/100

Stars 20%
89
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
0
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Scholar Review A structured workflow for academic paper review and rebuttal. Covers two modes: (1) pre-submission self-review to identify and fix weaknesses before submitting, and (2) post-review rebuttal writing to respond professionally to reviewer feedback. ## Pre-load (before execution) 1. **Codebase docs**: If `.workflow/codebase/ARCHITECTURE.md` exists, read for project context 2. **Specs**: `maestro load --type spec --category coding` — load coding conventions 3. **Wiki knowledge**: `maestro search "academic writing research paper" --json` — top 5 entries as prior context 4. All optional — proceed without if unavailable ## Architecture Overview ``` scholar-review | [Preference Collection] / \ Pre-Submission Post-Review | / | \ +-----------+ +--------+--------+---------+ | Phase 1 | | Phase 2| Phase 3| Phase 4 | | Self- | | Review | Response| Rebuttal| | Review | | Analysis| Strategy| Writing| +-----------+ +--------+--------+---------+ | \ | / v v v v self-review- rebuttal-response.md report.md | v +-----------+ ...

Details

Author
catlog22
Repository
catlog22/maestro-flow
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
None

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category