council

Featured

Collect independent perspectives for an explicitly high-stakes or contested judgment. Triggers: "council", "multi-judge review", "independent perspectives".

DevOps & Infrastructure 414 stars 40 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
87
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Council Council is an optional judgment strategy, not a lifecycle or delivery gate. Use it when one fresh validator is insufficient for a named irreversible, high-blast-radius, or genuinely contested decision. 1. Freeze one question, acceptance surface, evidence set, and subject digest. 2. Give each judge an independent context and the same bounded packet. 3. Require each judge to cite evidence, disclose omissions, and return its own judgment without seeing other answers first. 4. Synthesize agreement and disagreement without majority laundering. Preserve minority evidence and unresolved assumptions. 5. Write `council-report.v1` and return it to the caller. ## Methodology-weighted agreement Agreement across differing evidence methodologies counts more than agreement within one. Record each judge's evidence methodology (for example: static reading, executing the subject, tracing history) alongside its judgment. A consensus claim must name at least two distinct methodologies among its supporting judges; otherwise report it as single-method agreement and weight it as one confirmation, however many judges share it. The named failure mode is echo consensus: unanimous judgment produced from identical inputs by one shared method, laundered as independent confirmation. ## Model-diversity axis When the caller pins judges to model profiles, record each judge's `model_identity` beside its methodology and context ID (see the `agent-native` model-dispatch recipe). Cross-mode...

Details

Author
boshu2
Repository
boshu2/agentops
Created
8 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Go
License
Apache-2.0

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

council

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.

81 Updated 4 days ago
Rune-kit
AI & Automation Solid

council

Pressure-tests high-stakes engineering decisions through 5 advisors with distinct thinking styles — independent analysis, anonymous peer review, chairman synthesis. Use when the user says "council this", "run the council", "pressure-test", "stress-test", "red team this", or "devil's advocate" on a real engineering trade-off. Distinct from strategic-analysis — adds adversarial peer review for decisions where the user suspects their first instinct is biased.

0 Updated today
emrecdr
AI & Automation Solid

konsilium

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

14 Updated 3 days ago
Sanexxxx777