anti-ceremony

Featured

Guard outcome work against process overhead. Triggers: optional "quick guard"; explicit "full anti-ceremony audit" requests.

AI & Automation 434 stars 40 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 97/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Anti-Ceremony Keep work tied to the caller-visible outcome and the proof still needed for it. The optional guard is a single, artifact-free judgment when selected; the full honesty audit runs only on an explicit "full anti-ceremony audit" request. ## Prompt ```text Quick guard. Outcome: "ao gate check lists the probe-coverage row". Proposed process work: a coverage dashboard and a second audit pass. Remaining proof: the gate row, green in CI. Stop condition: that gate passes on main. ``` ## It's working if - The response is the YAML shape below and nothing else: no file appears under `.agents/`, and no tracker write is issued. - `reason:` is one sentence, and `parked_process_work:` names the dashboard-shaped items. - A full audit appears only after the caller wrote `full anti-ceremony audit`. ## Quick guard 1. Freeze the caller-visible outcome in one short statement. 2. Park proposed process work that has no concrete consumer, gated subject or release decision, observed defect, or retirement condition. 3. Name the implementation or independent proof still missing. 4. Name the condition that ends this traversal. 5. Return `STOP` when the traversal would only create control artifacts or the frozen outcome is already sufficiently proved; otherwise return `CONTINUE`. Progress needs evidence tied to acceptance or a named blocking uncertainty. Digest movement, finding counts, and additional reviews alone earn no credit. Informative red can justify a different ex...

Details

Author
boshu2
Repository
boshu2/agentops
Created
10 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Go
License
Apache-2.0

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category