skill-feedback
SolidCapture and aggregate real-world usage feedback for Agent Skills so the Skill Quality Gate loop can keep improving them over time. Use it whenever a skill misfires or underperforms: a skill triggered wrongly (wrong trigger), failed to auto-load on a relevant request (near-miss / description gap), produced a wrong, broken, or low-quality output (output issue), or the user manually corrected its result (manual correction). Also use it to review accumulated skill feedback before running skill-forge, or to close the feedback loop that raises skill quality. Writes one structured JSON object per line to feedback/<skill>/YYYY-MM-DD.jsonl and can summarize them into a report/export that feeds skill-forge's Optimize-description step. Trigger phrases: 'skill feedback', 'log skill feedback', 'skill triggered wrongly', 'near-miss trigger', 'wrong trigger', 'output issue', 'manual correction', 'improve skill', 'skill quality', 'feedback loop'.
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- bestdeejay-design
- Repository
- bestdeejay-design/agent-skills
- Created
- 1 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 weeks ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
skill-from-feedback
Use when the user wants to modify, improve, patch, or revise an existing agent skill from feedback — real session failures, “this skill did X wrong”, tighten triggers, fix workflow holes, or turn review notes into SKILL.md changes. Not for creating a brand-new skill from scratch (use capture-workflow / create-skill) and not for scanning all sessions (use agent-session-auditor).
skill-feedback
Review recent Claude Code sessions that used a specific agent or skill and submit per-session feedback as GitHub issues. Use when the user says "submit [agent/skill] feedback", "review my [agent/skill] sessions", or "file [agent/skill] feedback issues".
skill-improvement
Detects when a Claude Code session reveals a gap, bug, or improvement in an existing skill, then proposes a targeted patch and (with user approval) creates a local git branch and commit in the skills repo. Trigger this skill whenever you notice during a session that: a skill gave wrong or incomplete guidance, you had to correct or supplement a skill's instructions, a workaround was needed that should be documented, or the user says something like "the skill missed this", "add this to the skill", or "we should update the skill". Also trigger proactively at the end of any session that used a skill and produced fixes or new knowledge. Never wait for the user to ask.