lamina-research-scoping

Solid

Evidence scoping — what grounding is needed (repo, walkthrough, user input) vs assumption. Not human study scope.

Code & Development 65 stars 2 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
61
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
33
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Evidence Scoping (agent-native) Before design or verify, list **what evidence exists** and what must be captured. | Evidence | Source | |----------|--------| | Domain rules | User input, `business-context.md` | | Existing UI | Repo `surfaces[].source`, walkthrough pack | | Actor behavior | Verify actor walks on live product | | Metrics | User-provided only — never invented | Label each design claim: **verified**, **assumption**, or **to-verify**. ## Anti-patterns - **Exhaustive research scope** — delaying contract without blocking gaps - **Invented analytics** — fake A/B or usage data ## Related - [Live Grounding](../lamina-field-research/SKILL.md)

Details

Author
aryaniyaps
Repository
aryaniyaps/lamina
Created
3 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category