← ClaudeAtlas

aming-claw-hn-demo-after-worklisted

HN demo case for the fear that code changes leave docs, tests, and config stale after implementation. Guides evidence collection for Asset Inbox, binding state, Baseline and Possible drift, Review Queue, impact scope, and review boundaries.
amingclawdev/aming-claw · ★ 13 · Code & Development · score 67
Install: claude install-skill amingclawdev/aming-claw
## REQUIRED FIRST READ Before any response that uses this skill, in this exact order: ListMcpResourcesTool() ReadMcpResourceTool(uri="aming-claw://current-context") ReadMcpResourceTool(uri="aming-claw://skill") ReadMcpResourceTool(uri="aming-claw://graph-first") current-context anchors project_id, governance URLs, and 3 guardrails. skill is the operating contract (Start Sequence, Observer Operating Modes). graph-first has copy-pasteable graph_query payload examples. Common failures when these are skipped: - Bootstrapping the wrong project (workspace_match auto-detected aming-claw) - Calling task_create dev/pm (V1 default is observer-led mf_parallel.v1) - Using Grep on the aming-claw codebase instead of graph_query - Fabricating trace_id strings (audit ledger is server-resolvable, will fail) - Running Execution Supervisor mode by default (Design Alignment is default) # HN Demo: After Work Show how Aming Claw keeps docs, tests, and config from becoming invisible collateral damage after code changes. ## Fear Code changes land, but related docs, tests, or config are stale, orphaned, or accepted as true without review. ## Evidence To Collect - Asset Inbox: changed, orphaned, candidate, or bound doc/test/config assets. - Binding state: accepted, candidate, orphan, unbound, or source-controlled hint state. - Baseline/Possible drift: whether related assets are known clean, suspected, or pending impact review. - Review Queue: proposal review boundary for AI or we