slide-excellence

Solid

The one review fan-out for a deck - visual audit, pedagogical review (with the devil's-advocate challenges), proofreading, fact check against the deck's declared sources, and a render audit of full-deck screenshots, run as parallel subagents and synthesized. Use for a comprehensive quality check before milestones, or when the user says "review the deck", "proofread", "pedagogy review", "fact check", or "challenge the slides".

Code & Development 6 stars 1 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
28
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Slide Excellence Review Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of a Quarto deck. Up to five components run independently and in parallel, then the results are synthesized into one summary. This is the one fan-out: the former standalone proofreading, pedagogy, and devil's-advocate skills were folded in here, and the fact check and render audit joined in WP6. **Read-only.** No agent edits a source file. Fixes are applied separately after the presenter reviews the reports. ## Steps ### 1. Resolve the deck and capture its premises `$ARGUMENTS` is a deck name (bare name or `genre/name`). Resolve paths through the scripts, never by hand, and capture three things every agent will receive: ```bash QMD=$(python3 scripts/deckpath.py <Deck> --field qmd) PROFILE_JSON=$(python3 scripts/deckprofile.py <Deck>) # resolved profile, as JSON DECK_YML=$(cat "$(python3 scripts/deckpath.py <Deck> --field config)") # <deck>.deck.yml verbatim ``` If the deck predates `/new-deck` and has no `deck.yml`, `DECK_YML` is empty: say so, and the agents review against the genre's default profile (the profile JSON still resolves). Set `DATE` to today as `YYYY-MM-DD`. All reports for this run go under `quality_reports/reviews/` (`mkdir -p` it): | Component | Report | |---|---| | slide-auditor | `quality_reports/reviews/<Deck>-visual-<DATE>.md` | | pedagogy-reviewer | `quality_reports/reviews/<Deck>-pedagogy-<DATE>.md` | | proofreader | `quality_reports/reviews/<Deck>-proofread-<DATE...

Details

Author
alohays
Repository
alohays/paper2pr
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Testing & QA Listed

slide-qa

Visual QA of a generated deck from thumbnails: fetch every page as PNG, inspect against a defect checklist (overflow, overlaps, wrong connectors, weak contrast), drive the fix-and-regenerate loop, and clean up the local QA files. The generation skills invoke it when the user opts in (the default); it also runs standalone on any deck URL. Use for: スライドを検証して, デッキを QA して, サムネイルで確認して, visual QA. Not: pre-generation offline checks (--dry-run / validate_layout.py stay in the generation skills); content fact-checking; PPTX files (pptx-export).

2 Updated 2 weeks ago
wfukatsu
Code & Development Solid

codeck-review

Reviewer role. Opens rendered HTML, inspects every slide visually, fixes problems in custom.css or slides.html and rebuilds through build-html.sh. Use whenever the user says "review", "QA", "check slides", "inspect", "audit", "proofread", or wants feedback on a rendered deck.

198 Updated 1 months ago
hiyeshu
Data & Documents Featured

slide-maker

Build, redesign, and critique clean, presentation-grade slide decks (.pptx) for any audience — research/lab meetings, work status updates, conference talks, stakeholder readouts, thesis defenses, teaching, webinars. Use whenever the user wants to make, create, redo, clean up, improve, or review slides / a deck / a presentation — e.g. "make slides for my project", "build a deck from this paper/code/doc", "turn these results into slides", "redesign this pptx", "my slides are too dense", "review my deck and tell me what's weak", "make a slide about X", "help me present this work". Works with or without a template (matches theirs, else designs a clean one) and with or without source material (mines provided code/docs/figures, else web-researches and fact-checks), in any language (e.g. English or 中文). Interviews first, then runs an actor–critic loop until an independent critic consents. Trigger even without the words "skill", "deck", or "pptx".

505 Updated 2 days ago
addsumtech