investigate

Solid

Gather facts (files, deps, patterns) without making changes. Trigger when the user runs /investigate or asks to "look into this", "explore the codebase", "understand how this works", "what files are involved", "map the dependencies", or wants read-only fact-gathering before deciding what to do.

AI & Automation 0 stars 0 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
0
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /investigate Read-only fact-gathering — understand the codebase before acting. > **Structured execution spec:** [`protocol.yon`](protocol.yon). Read it for the canonical rules and step sequence; this file is explanation. The two must stay in sync — if you edit one, update the other and refresh the `@STAMP` date. > **Caller Options.** Before executing, run the Caller Options protocol (`caller-options/SKILL.md`): triage this invocation for material optionality across the venues and modes declared in front-matter; if one path clearly dominates, proceed silently; otherwise surface the options to the caller. A resolved-invocation marker means COP already ran — execute the fixed combination directly, do not re-enter COP. > **Fact-Gathering Protocol. READ ONLY.** No plans, no code, no refactors. Just facts. ## Phase 1 — Context Loading 1. **Parse the query** — identify target files, directories, or concepts from the user's request. 2. **List files** — read the target directory structure. 3. **Read entrypoints** — load `package.json`, `README.md`, index files, or whatever serves as the front door to the target area. ## Phase 2 — Pattern Discovery 1. **Search for usages** — grep for functions, components, or patterns relevant to the query. Follow call sites and import chains. 2. **Load relevant skills** — check if a domain skill applies: - If your repository maintains its own standards skills (UI conventions, coding standards), load the matching one — this pack does not s...

Details

Author
allemaar
Repository
allemaar/open-skills
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

investigate

Start a structured investigation for new work — gather context from files, issues, git, and agents, then synthesize into design docs, create a plan, and file GitHub issues. Accepts a goal description with hints about information sources.

0 Updated yesterday
DazzleML
AI & Automation Listed

investigate

Deep multi-perspective codebase investigation. Use when: analyzing feasibility of a new feature, auditing code for issues, investigating bugs, evaluating technical debt, or assessing any change before planning. Dispatches investigations across the dimensions that matter for the question asked, refutes every finding before reporting it, and synthesizes into one actionable report. Trigger: "investigate this", "is this feasible", "analyze my codebase", "audit this", "what would it take to", "assess this", "can we do this", "deep dive", "research this before we start".

0 Updated yesterday
makieali
AI & Automation Listed

researcher

Runs multi-source investigations using a structured evidence-mapping cycle. Routes between business research, academic research, and claim verification. Triggers on: "research", "investigate", "verify", "compare", "analyze", "look into", "dig into", "fact check", "due diligence", "deep dive", "what is really happening", "how do real practitioners see this", "is this true", "is this legit", "what's the real story", "market landscape", "state of the art", "literature review", "competitive analysis", "opportunity scan", "risk assessment", "研究", "调研", "调查", "分析", "验证", "核实", "深挖", "摸底", "行业分析", "市场调研", "竞品分析", "尽调", "尽职调查", "这个靠谱吗", "真实情况是什么", "帮我查查", "帮我看看", "有没有前景", "值不值得", "到底怎么样", "是真的吗", "论文调研", "文献综述", "技术选型", "机会分析".

1 Updated today
droftgamer-wq