scholarly-citation

Solid

Verifiable-attribution and citation-discipline craft — atomic claim decomposition, evidence grading (primary/analysis/forecast tiers), claimant attribution, citation typing (cites/references/contradicts/defines), source anchoring (Xanadu). Use when writing or reviewing a reference or synthesis page that attributes and cites source-based claims so they stay traceable, or when claim attribution, citation typing, or evidence grading is needed.

AI & Automation 66 stars 10 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
61
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# scholarly-citation Verifiable-attribution craft drawn from scholarly/scientific citation traditions (citation classification, typing, anchoring). It ensures every claim in this wiki is atomized, evidence-graded, attributed to a speaker, typed by citation meaning, and anchored to a source location — and therefore traceable. Unlike the three borrowed traditions (narrative, exec summary, encyclopedic neutrality), this craft synthesizes external sources into an atomic-claim schema and is the project's signature. `criteria.json` is the SoT for each criterion's definition, comparator, and source; wiki-global state (page existence·hub type·section titles) is injected by the orchestrator (`tools/_lint/source.py`). The schema literals (`## Key Claims`, `[fact]`, `cites:` etc.) are the wiki's actual schema markers and section headers. ## Claim atomization & grading (cit.grade-marker · cit.atomic · cit.composite-split) One claim, one line, one utterance. Each line of `## Key Claims` (Key Claims) marks an evidence grade — `[fact]` (primary source), `[analysis]` (secondary analysis), `[forecast]` (forecast). Putting two subjects' claims on one line (joined by "and"/"&" or a comma series spanning two hubs; ko: the conjunctions `와`/`및`), or chaining verb phrases on one line ("…did, and …did"; ko: `~했고, ~했다`), breaks atomicity. ## Claimant attribution (cit.claimant-link · cit.claimant-valid · cit.speaker-link) Every claim is bound to who said it. A `[[claimant]]` wikilink right after ...

Details

Author
alfadur7
Repository
alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

content-research-and-sourcing

The research-and-sourcing craft — verify the substance of a piece before it publishes: trace stats to primary sources, kill zombie stats, catch AI-hallucinated citations, and attribute properly on social. Use when someone has a stat-heavy draft to make publish-ready, wants to check if a viral statistic is real, asks how to cite sources, used AI research output, or is making health/finance claims. Uses the FACTS framework. Reads brand-profile + the piece's format skill first. AI-supplied citations are guilty until verified; a working link is not verification; aggregators are leads, not the source; where none exists, reframe as owned observation or commission data. The agent verifies where it has search; the human clicks links where it doesn't; verification happens before scheduling; WoopSocial publishes. Never invents studies or reuses retracted stats. Distinct from idea-generation, data-and-original-research, quote-cards, and infographic-and-data-viz.

5 Updated 3 days ago
social-media-skills
AI & Automation Solid

scholar-citation-verify

Four-layer citation verification for academic papers. Scans LaTeX/BibTeX files, verifies every citation via WebSearch and Google Scholar, generates verification report with fix suggestions. Triggers on "verify citations", "check references", "citation verification", "prevent fake citations", "引用验证".

482 Updated today
catlog22
AI & Automation Listed

claim-strengthener

A spell-checker for AI visibility that scans campaign copy for vague, uncitable phrases and converts them into specific, quotable facts. Use whenever a user pastes or shares a policy page, press release, issues section, "About" page, platform, endorsement page, or any campaign or advocacy copy and wants it to be more credible, more citable, more persuasive, more "quotable," or more likely to be picked up by AI answer engines, search, or the press. Also trigger when a user asks to "strengthen," "tighten," "fact-check," "add sources to," "make more specific," or "find the weak claims in" their messaging — even if they don't mention AI or citations explicitly. Works in batches for long copy and hands back a clean, reassembled final version. Do NOT invent statistics, quotes, or sources; always prompt the user to supply real evidence.

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
meturley