journalism-writing

Featured

Journalism and argumentation writing craft — inverted pyramid, lede, nut graph, kicker, explainer framing, PAGE frames, Toulmin argument (claim/rebuttal/qualifier), Hegelian dialectic, BBC due impartiality. Use when writing or reviewing news/explainer pieces, landscape overviews, or issue analyses that fairly juxtapose opposing views, or when a strong lede, sound argument structure, or balanced conclusion is needed.

AI & Automation 166 stars 27 forks Updated 2 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 87/100

Stars 20%
74
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# journalism-writing Writing craft drawn from news/explanatory journalism and argumentation traditions — narrative lead (Lede→Nut graph→Kicker), dialectical structure (thesis·antithesis·synthesis), argument quality (Toulmin), and fairness (BBC due impartiality). `criteria.json` is the SoT for each criterion's definition, comparator, and source. The shared parsing and wiki-global state that the deterministic checks (judge=A) rely on are injected by the orchestrator (the skill is content-type-agnostic). Examples are illustrative of the target English prose. ## Dialectic structure (jrn.thesis-antithesis · jrn.c-section-size · jrn.c-stance-naming · jrn.monitoring-balance) Develop an issue as Hegelian thesis → antithesis → synthesis. State thesis and antithesis with explicit **Position A / Position B** bold labels (ko rendering: **A 입장 / B 입장**); add a **C — Mediation** label (ko: **C 중재**) only when a genuine convergence exists. The C paragraph must not run longer than the longer of A and B, so the convergence is not mistaken for the main clash. If C is not a synthesis but a meta-critique (weakening both sides at once, flagging interest bias), move it out of the dialectic frame — a meta-critique in the C slot breaks the three-part structure. Synthesis does not pick a winner. In Hegel's terms it *sublates* — cancels and preserves — identifying what each side correctly grasps. Concretely, place each side's **monitoring point** (what one would observe if that side were right) sy...

Details

Author
alfadur7
Repository
alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

column-editorial

Writes argumentative columns, editorials, and op-eds with contrarian thesis, steelmanned counter-arguments, and layered evidence. Use when user asks about column writing, op-ed, editorial, opinion piece, thought piece, 칼럼, 오피니언, 사설, 논평, or 기고문.

3 Updated 3 days ago
Yoodaddy0311
AI & Automation Listed

critique-argument

Reviews argumentative prose - essays, proposals, position papers, recommendation memos, strategy docs, and op-eds - against the Toulmin model of argument: whether the claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal are present, explicit, and actually hold together. Judges the argument's structure, not prose readability or sentence mechanics (critique-clarity covers that). Use when the user asks for a review, feedback, a second opinion, a red-line pass, a quality check, or a critique of whether an argument holds up before it goes out.

1 Updated today
product-on-purpose
AI & Automation Listed

writing-ecosystem

人間向け記事・エッセイ・ブログポスト・ニュースレターの唯一の執筆 orchestrator。project の publication channel contract を読み、中心命題 1 つの editorial brief、因果線、証拠の選択と除外、構成、執筆、review panel、著者の内容 GO、title-reviewer、quality-gate までを統括する。Use when — 「この記事を書いて」「このテーマでエッセイにして」「原稿の論点を一つに絞って構造改稿して」のような新規執筆・全体改稿・全文の別 channel 展開。NOT for — 一文や段落だけの翻訳(→ prose-translation)、title だけ(→ headline-craft / title-reviewer)、SNS 下書き(→ x-draft)、公開 thread 返信(→ public-comment)、AI 向け docs、README、paper、媒体固有の公開操作。

1 Updated 3 days ago
shimo4228