obsidian-note-criticlisted

## Overview The skill analyzes a note along four axes: 1. **Similar knowledge** — what already exists in the base on this topic 2. **Opposing views** — alternative approaches, competing ideas 3. **Contradictions** — where the note diverges from existing knowledge 4. **Reasoned critique** — weak points in logic, wording, coverage completeness **Vault root folder (`<vault>/`):** set at install time (`--vault` or the `OBSIDIAN_VAULT` env var). See `.claude/rules/vault-struct.md`. **Output language:** Russian, technical terms in English. --- ## Algorithm ### 1. Read the note Read the full content. Note down for yourself: - **Main thesis** — what's being claimed or described (one phrase) - **Key claims** — 3–7 specific statements from the text - **Domain** — field of knowledge (SRE, DevOps, career, management, etc.) - **Sources** — is there a `sources` field, `links`, quotes, or is this purely personal opinion - **Confidence** — the `confidence` field, if present ### 2. Search for similar topics Use `mcp__obsidian-hybrid-search__myvault_search` with several phrasings to catch different angles on the same topic. Good practice is to give three queries: one in Russian, one in English, and one "by contrast" (what this is NOT, or how it differs). Parameters: - `queries`: [main thesis, key concept, English equivalent] - `limit`: 8 - `threshold`: 0.3 - `rerank`: true Skip the note being analyzed itself (usually rank 1). Collect the 4–7 most relevant results. ### 3. Search f