← ClaudeAtlas

aigr-pr-reviewlisted

Review AI Gene Review pull requests and curation changes for GO term quality, evidence support, core function identification, and annotation action justification. Use for PR review comments, review follow-up automation, and QA of gene review YAML.
ai4curation/ai-gene-review · ★ 20 · AI & Automation · score 74
Install: claude install-skill ai4curation/ai-gene-review
# AIGR PR Review Skill Use this skill when reviewing AIGR pull requests or drafting review feedback about gene review YAML, GO annotation decisions, evidence support, or UniProt-backed summaries. Use the repository's existing guidance and agents where appropriate, especially `CLAUDE.md` and `.claude/agents/annotation-reviewer.md`. ## Trust Validation Do not re-check what `just validate` already covers. If validation passes, do not spend review effort on: - YAML formatting or whitespace - Empty or null optional keys - Required-vs-optional field presence - Enum spelling, structural schema shape, or other deterministic validation concerns The reviewer's job is the non-deterministic part: biological judgment, GO ontology judgment, evidence quality, and whether the curation narrative is coherent. ## Focus Areas 1. GO term specificity and aspect correctness - Prefer the most accurate GO term supported by the evidence, not the nearest generic match. - Flag terms that are too broad, too narrow, or placed in the wrong GO aspect. - Be especially skeptical of vague terms like `protein binding` when a more informative MF term is available. - If recommending `MODIFY`, provide the concrete replacement term(s) with GO IDs. 2. Evidence quality - Each annotation review should be supported by accessible evidence. - Check that cited PMIDs, GO references, file references, and supporting text actually justify the claimed action. - Do not accept unsupported `NEW` annotations. - If the rel