hive.quality-monitor

Solid

Periodically self-assess output quality to catch degradation before the judge does.

AI & Automation 10,471 stars 5660 forks Updated 2 days ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 88/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
27
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Operational Protocol: Quality Self-Assessment Every {{assessment_interval}} iterations, self-assess: 1. On-task? Still working toward the stated objective? 2. Thorough? Cutting corners compared to earlier? 3. Non-repetitive? Producing new value or rehashing? 4. Consistent? Latest output contradict earlier decisions? 5. Complete? Tracking all items, or silently dropped some? If degrading: write assessment to `_quality_log`, re-read `_working_notes`, change approach explicitly. If acceptable: brief note in `_quality_log`.

Details

Author
aden-hive
Repository
aden-hive/hive
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

self-eval

Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.

16,782 Updated 3 days ago
alirezarezvani
AI & Automation Listed

qa-iteration

Assess and improve Primr output quality. Use when the user asks to review, grade, refine, or troubleshoot a report or strategy document.

3 Updated yesterday
blisspixel
AI & Automation Listed

evaluate

Comprehensive quality grading. Checks prompt compliance, code quality, security, test coverage, architecture fitness. Produces a percentage score. Not lenient. Keywords: evaluate, grade, check, verify, validate, scorecard, quality, percentage, score, how good

2 Updated today
jvalin17
AI & Automation Listed

code-qualities-assessment

Assess code maintainability through 5 foundational qualities (cohesion, coupling, encapsulation, testability, non-redundancy) with quantifiable scoring rubrics. Works at method/class/module levels across multiple languages. Produces markdown reports with remediation guidance. Use when you ask to "assess maintainability", "score cohesion/coupling/testability" on specific code. Do NOT use for a full pre-merge review (use review) or repo-wide domain grading (use quality-grades).

34 Updated today
rjmurillo
AI & Automation Solid

skill-quality-reviewer

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.

4,135 Updated today
Galaxy-Dawn