deep-research

Solid

Exhaustive multi-source synthesis on any topic with explicit source credibility tiering and per-finding confidence — analyst-grade, not aggregator-grade

AI & Automation 508 stars 166 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
90
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

<!-- autoresearch: variation B — sharper output: CRAAP-lite credibility tiering, per-finding confidence levels, and falsifiability discipline --> > **${var}** — Research question or topic. Append `--depth=shallow` for a quick 5-source pass, `--depth=deep` (default) for a 30–50 source comprehensive report. ## Overview This skill ingests 30–50 sources in a single 1M-token context session, but unlike most "deep research" pipelines it does not weight every URL equally. Each source is classified by type (primary / secondary / tertiary) and scored on a CRAAP-lite rubric (Authority, Recency, Verifiability) producing a tier (T1 / T2 / T3). Every finding in the final report carries an explicit confidence level grounded in how many T1 sources corroborate it. The report includes a "Falsifiable claims" section so the reader knows what evidence would change the conclusion. Run on-demand via `workflow_dispatch` with `var` set to the research question. Not recommended as a daily cron — save it for questions that warrant the depth. --- ## Steps ### 0. Parse parameters Extract topic and depth from `${var}`: - If `${var}` contains `--depth=shallow`, use shallow mode (5 sources, ~600 words). - Otherwise default to **deep** mode (30–50 sources, 3,000–5,000 words). - The research topic is everything in `${var}` before any `--depth=` flag. - Example: `"AI agent security 2026 --depth=deep"` → topic = "AI agent security 2026", depth = deep. Read `memory/MEMORY.md` for prior research context...

Details

Author
aaronjmars
Repository
aaronjmars/aeon
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

deep-research

Deep research harness — fan-out web searches, fetch sources, adversarially verify claims, synthesize a cited report.

41,770 Updated today
asgeirtj
AI & Automation Listed

deep-research

Deep research skill — broad parallel web searches, multi-source validation, confidence tracking, cited Markdown report. Supports 11 research types: market (TAM/SAM, segments, pricing, trends), domain (industry structure, ecosystem, regulatory landscape), technical (architecture, tools, benchmarks), competitive (competitor teardown, positioning, win/loss), product (feature analysis, reviews, roadmap signals), academic (literature survey, citation networks, key authors), person/org (due diligence on a company or public figure), financial (funding rounds, valuation multiples, revenue signals), legal (IP, patents, litigation, compliance), trend (emerging signals, foresight, scenario mapping), community (ecosystem health, key voices, governance, fragmentation). Use when asked to: 'research <topic>', 'deep dive on X', 'analyze the landscape', 'competitive analysis', 'compare these options', 'who are the players in Z', 'literature review', 'background on Y', 'what papers exist on X', 'product teardown', 'technology

2 Updated today
hssh8917
AI & Automation Listed

deep-research

Deep, multi-source, fact-checked research reports — entirely on the Claude subscription, no API keys. Plans a TOC + acceptance criteria, fans out parallel Task subagents that search the live web (native WebSearch/WebFetch), gap-fills weak sections, then synthesizes a long-form report with inline [n] citations and a Sources list whose every URL is DETERMINISTICALLY verified against URLs that actually appeared in search results (fabricated citations are dropped). A subscription-only port of NVIDIA AI-Q's deep-research core. Use when the user wants a thorough researched report, a literature/landscape/market scan, a cited comparison, or "deep research" / "research X for me". BEFORE invoking, if the question is underspecified (e.g. "what car should I buy" with no budget/use/region), ask 2-3 clarifying questions to narrow scope, then research the refined question.

4 Updated 1 weeks ago
WillInvest