peer-review-simulator
SolidSkill for simulating peer review feedback on manuscripts
Install
Quality Score: 94/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- a5c-ai
- Repository
- a5c-ai/babysitter
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
paper-review
Use this skill when the user wants to simulate a review of their paper, check it before submission, or understand how reviewers might perceive it. Triggers include: "review my paper", "simulate review", "check before submit", "reviewer perspective", "will this get accepted". Also use before submission to catch weaknesses that reviewers would find.
peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.