orchestrated-execution

Solid

Execute work units through the rigorous 4-phase Metaswarm cycle (Implement -> Validate -> Adversarial Review -> Commit) with independent quality gate enforcement.

AI & Automation 1,160 stars 71 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
63
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Orchestrated Execution ## Overview Execute work units through the Metaswarm 4-phase cycle. Quality gates are blocking state transitions. Adversarial reviews use fresh reviewers with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts. ## When to Use - Implementing work units from an approved plan - Executing tasks requiring rigorous quality enforcement - When TDD compliance must be verified independently ## Process 1. **IMPLEMENT** - Coder executes via TDD against spec with DoD items 2. **VALIDATE** - Orchestrator independently runs tsc, eslint, vitest (never trusts subagent) 3. **ADVERSARIAL REVIEW** - Fresh reviewer checks spec compliance: binary PASS/FAIL with evidence 4. **COMMIT** - Only after adversarial PASS, within declared file scope ## Anti-Patterns (Enforced) - Self-certifying (trusting subagent "tests passed" claims) - Combining phases into single steps - Reusing reviewers after FAIL - Passing previous review findings to new reviewers - Treating quality gate failures as advisory ## Agents Used - `agents/coder/` - TDD implementation - `agents/code-reviewer/` - Fresh adversarial review - `agents/issue-orchestrator/` - Independent validation ## Tool Use Invoke via babysitter process: `methodologies/metaswarm/metaswarm-execution-loop`

Details

Author
a5c-ai
Repository
a5c-ai/babysitter
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

plan-review-gate

Adversarial plan review by 3 independent reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) before presenting to user.

1,160 Updated today
a5c-ai
AI & Automation Listed

agent-swarm

Multi-agent workflow for large features that span many files and concern areas. Coordinates parallel sub-agents (architect / code-reviewer / planner) with role-scoped contracts and merge-back integration.

2 Updated today
shashankcm95
AI & Automation Listed

spec-workflow-orchestrator

Orchestrate comprehensive planning phase from ideation to development-ready specifications using 4 specialized agents

3 Updated today
zubayer0077
AI & Automation Listed

ai-team-workflow

Organize AI agents as a structured team — role assignment, proposal/vote/ review/ship cycle, cross-agent code review, consensus mechanisms, and escalation to human for deadlocks. Use when asked about "AI team", "agents working as a team", "multi-agent workflow", "agent roles", "agent review", "agents vote", "Hivemoot", "AI proposes and votes", "agent consensus", "agents reviewing each other's work", "define agent roles", "AI standup", or "autonomous team of agents". Do NOT use for: git-based task coordination — see git-native-agent-protocol. Do NOT use for: safety gates — see agent-safety-patterns.

3 Updated today
phamlongh230-lgtm
Code & Development Solid

adversarial-review

Fresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.

1,160 Updated today
a5c-ai