literary-close-reading
SolidPerform systematic textual analysis identifying patterns in language, imagery, narrative structure, and rhetorical devices
Install
Quality Score: 94/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- a5c-ai
- Repository
- a5c-ai/babysitter
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
close-reading
Stay with a literary passage at the level of the sentence, the word, the phoneme. Refuse to ascend to theme until the material texture has been inhabited. Use this skill whenever a user shares a passage of literature, poetry, song lyrics, or prose and asks you to analyze it, break it down, examine what it's doing, explain why it works, or reverse-engineer the craft. Also triggers on: 'look at this passage,' 'what is this sentence doing,' 'how does this work,' 'word by word,' 'why does this line hit so hard,' 'close read this,' 'analyze the prose,' 'reverse engineer this writing,' 'break down this paragraph,' or any moment where a specific passage is offered as an object of attention rather than a source of information. If the user shares a literary excerpt and asks a question about craft, technique, style, or effect — use this skill. Do NOT use for academic paper analysis (use paper-hermeneutics), adversarial critique (use paper-scrying), or free-associative riffing (use paper-riffing).
hermeneutical-interpretation
Conduct systematic textual interpretation using historical-critical, literary, and phenomenological methods while attending to context, genre, and interpretive traditions
critical-theory-application
Apply theoretical frameworks (postcolonial, feminist, Marxist, post-structuralist) to cultural texts and phenomena
critical-analyst
Deep critical analysis of any text, document, code, or specification to find contradictions (e.g., code does X but spec says Y), ambiguities (vague terms, undefined criteria, multiple interpretations), inconsistencies (different names for the same concept), and logical gaps (missing steps in reasoning chains) — along with suggestions on how to fix each issue. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks to review, critique, or analyze a document, codebase, spec, requirements, architecture decision, step-by-step explanation, or any text for quality issues. Use it for requests like "find problems with", "review critically", "check for contradictions", "verify consistency", "analyze for issues", "revisar documento", "analisar especificação", or "encontrar problemas em".
scholarly-literature-synthesis
Survey, analyze, and synthesize philosophical literature on topics, identify major positions, trace debates, and locate gaps in scholarly discourse