deep-reviewlisted

# Deep review (Workflow-driven) The heavyweight form of `risk-review` for **L3/L4** diffs. It reviews each risk dimension in parallel and **adversarially verifies every finding**, so only confirmed risks reach the report — no plausible-but-wrong noise. ## When to use - **Explicit invocation only**, **L3/L4 only.** For a routine diff use `risk-review` (single pass) — say so and stop. - Drives the `Workflow` tool (~15× tokens) — invoking it is the opt-in. - **If `Workflow` is unavailable**, fall back to `risk-review`'s single pass and say so. ## How to run 1. Ensure there is a diff (`git diff`) and, if a spec exists, its acceptance-criterion IDs. 2. Invoke the `Workflow` tool with `name: "groundwork:deep-review-run"`. Optional `args`: `scope` (what to review, default the working diff) and `criteria` (where the acceptance-criterion IDs live). The script ships with the plugin — do **not** rewrite it inline; it holds the dimension list, the two-lens adversarial panel, and the conformance pass, and it logs its own fan-out. 3. Present **confirmed** risks (ranked, with file:line) · required approvals · missing / after-the-fact tests · suggested fixes · spec-conformance gaps. ## Output Ranked confirmed risks, each survived adversarial verification, plus spec-conformance gaps. The workflow returns `examined` and `dropped` alongside `confirmed`, so the report states its denominator — "12 findings examined, 5 confirmed, 7 dropped as false alarms" — rather than an unq