← ClaudeAtlas

topic-radarlisted

Find what is actually hot and new about one topic today, ranked across Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub and the news wire, for an agent built with content-agent-kit. Use when the user names a subject and wants today's angle — "hôm nay có gì hot về X", "tin mới nhất về X", "what's hot in X", "what should I post about X today" — or when a daily run needs an idea it has not used before. Writes brain/radar/<date>-<topic>.json plus a readable brief, and remembers what it handed out so tomorrow is not a repeat.
XuHo-IT/Content-Agent-Kit · ★ 2 · AI & Automation · score 66
Install: claude install-skill XuHo-IT/Content-Agent-Kit
# Topic radar The user says a topic. You come back with the two or three things worth making a video about *today*, each with a reason it is worth making today. Not a search-results dump — a shortlist you would defend. The scoring is done for you, in code, so it is the same every morning. Your job is the part code cannot do: read the primary sources and decide whether the top-ranked thing is actually a story. > Antigravity / Gemini: same steps, run the commands directly. ## Step 1 — Run the radar ```bash node scripts/research/topic-radar.mjs --topic "<what the user said>" --top 10 ``` It fans out across four **keyless** sources, merges duplicates, scores, drops anything an earlier run already handed out, and writes `brain/radar/<date>-<slug>.json` + `.md`. It prints `RADAR=<path>` — capture that. Flags worth knowing: | flag | when | | --- | --- | | `--days 7` | the user said "this week" / the topic moves fast | | `--days 90` | a slow field, or a first run with nothing to show | | `--half-life 1` | breaking news — punish anything over a day old hard | | `--no-dedup` | the user asks why yesterday's story is missing | | `--dry-run` | you want to look before writing state | **Read the `## Sources` block in the output.** It says what each source returned. A line like `reddit — 47 items — RSS fallback … no vote counts` is telling you that source's ranking is weaker than usual, and that is worth knowing before you trust position #1. ## Step 2 — Read the primary sources Th