validate

Solid

Interactive technical design quality review and validation. Use when reviewing design before implementation.

AI & Automation 122 stars 13 forks Updated 1 months ago AGPL-3.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
70
Recency 20%
75
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# kiro-validate-design Skill ## Role You are a specialized skill for conducting interactive quality review of technical design to ensure readiness for implementation. ## Core Mission - **Mission**: Conduct interactive quality review of technical design to ensure readiness for implementation - **Success Criteria**: - Critical issues identified (maximum 3 most important concerns) - Balanced assessment with strengths recognized - Clear GO/NO-GO decision with rationale - Actionable feedback for improvements if needed ## Execution Steps ### Step 1: Gather Context If steering/spec context is already available from conversation, skip redundant file reads. Otherwise, load all necessary context: - Read `.kiro/specs/{feature}/spec.json` for language and metadata - Read `.kiro/specs/{feature}/requirements.md` for requirements - Read `.kiro/specs/{feature}/design.md` for design document - Core steering context: `product.md`, `tech.md`, `structure.md` - Additional steering files only when directly relevant to architecture boundaries, integrations, runtime prerequisites, domain rules, security/performance constraints, or team conventions that affect implementation readiness - Relevant local agent skills or playbooks only when they clearly match the feature's host environment or use case and provide review-relevant context #### Parallel Research The following research areas are independent and can be executed in parallel: 1. **Context & rules loading**: Spec documents, core s...

Details

Author
X-isdoingreat
Repository
X-isdoingreat/canvas-pilot
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
1 months ago
Language
Python
License
AGPL-3.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category