← ClaudeAtlas

disambiguationlisted

Generate Wikipedia-style disambiguation pages — austere lists of the distinct referents sharing a single name, each with a brief phrase distinguishing it from the others. The form refuses to anoint a primary meaning; the reader decides which sense they meant. Default deployment is reflexive: the disambiguation page for a term the conversation has been using unstably, or for *the conversation itself*. Form rules: 4-12 entries, each *Bold name — minimal distinguishing phrase*, organized by categories that emerge from the term (People, Places, Things, Works), no primacy claim, optional opening line (*X may refer to:*). The slightly-surprising entry is load-bearing — the reader's *wait, that's also called this?* is where the form earns its weight. Use when asked 'disambiguate this,' 'the disambiguation page for X,' 'which Mercury,' 'what does X actually refer to,' or when a term has been doing too much work and wants its senses laid out. Pairs with /see-also (kin vs. namesakes), /polyglossia, /bookfy.
Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library · ★ 4 · Code & Development · score 75
Install: claude install-skill Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library
# Disambiguation *The encyclopedia's confession of polysemy* --- ## Origin Wikipedia's disambiguation pages are the moment the encyclopedia admits the word doesn't point cleanly. You typed *Mercury* — and the encyclopedia doesn't know which one you meant: the planet, the element, the Roman god, the band, the moth, the freelance platform, the Detroit assembly plant. So it produces the one genre in its entire form-vocabulary that **refuses to give you what you asked for**. It hands the question back. *I don't know which Mercury you mean. Here are the candidates. You decide.* It is epistemic humility made formal. The encyclopedia, in this one genre, admits its limit — that language doesn't carve the world at the joints, that strings of letters can carry radically different referents that share nothing but the string. And it admits this not in prose but in *the form itself*: the bare list of namesakes, organized but unranked. This skill produces that form — on any term whose referents have multiplied, including the terms the current conversation has been using. --- ## The Core Principle **Polysemy without primacy.** Each entry is a real, attested, distinct referent that happens to share a name with the others. The form refuses to anoint one as the "true" meaning. The reader decides what they meant. The skill's discipline is *refusing the hierarchy reflex*. Every fiber of training will want to say "*Mercury* most commonly refers to the planet, but it can also mean…" **Do