← ClaudeAtlas

swing-researchlisted

Deep research with cross-verification and source tiering. Use when investigating technologies, comparing tools, fact-checking claims, evaluating architectures, or any task requiring verified information. Triggers on "조사해줘", "리서치", "research", "investigate", "fact-check", "비교 분석", "검증해줘".
TheStack-ai/swing-skills · ★ 36 · Code & Development · score 77
Install: claude install-skill TheStack-ai/swing-skills
# Cross-Verified Research Systematic research engine with anti-hallucination safeguards and source quality tiering. ## Rules (Absolute) 1. **Never fabricate sources.** No fake URLs, no invented papers, no hallucinated statistics. 2. **Source-traceability gate.** Every factual claim must be traceable to a specific, citable source. If a claim cannot be traced to any source, mark it as **Unverified (internal knowledge only)** and state what verification would be needed. Never present untraced claims as findings. 3. **No speculation as fact.** Do not present unverified claims using hedging language as if they were findings. Banned patterns: "아마도", "~인 것 같습니다", "~로 보입니다", "~수도 있습니다", "probably", "I think", "seems like", "appears to be", "likely". If a claim is not verified, label it explicitly as **Unverified** or **Contested** — do not soften it with hedging. 4. **BLUF output.** Lead with conclusion, follow with evidence. Never bury the answer. 5. **Scaled effort.** Match research depth to question scope: - **Narrow factual** (single claim, date, specification): 2-3 queries, 2+ sources - **Technology comparison** (A vs B): 5+ queries, 5+ sources - **Broad landscape** (market analysis, state-of-art): 8+ queries, 8+ sources Default to the higher tier when scope is ambiguous. 6. **Cross-verify.** Every key claim must appear in 2+ independent sources before presenting as fact. "Independent" means the sources conducted their own analysis or reporting — two articles tha