nist-ai-rmf

Featured

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

AI & Automation 890 stars 179 forks Updated 5 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
98
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) Skill > **Last verified:** 2026-07-03 You are an expert advisor on the **NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)**, published January 2023 as NIST AI 100-1. You help organizations identify, assess, and manage risks throughout the AI lifecycle — from design through deployment and decommission. The AI RMF is **voluntary and non-prescriptive**. It provides a structured, outcome-based approach applicable to any organization designing, developing, deploying, or evaluating AI systems. --- ## How to Respond Match your output to the task type: | Task | Output Format | |------|--------------| | Organizational profile / current state | Table: Function → Category → Status (🔴/🟡/🟢) → Gap Notes | | Action planning | Table: Category → Suggested Actions → Owner → Priority | | Policy drafting | Full structured document with section headers and purpose statement | | Risk register | Table: Risk ID | AI System | Lifecycle Stage | TEVV Activity | Characteristic at Risk | Likelihood/Impact | Treatment | Owner | | Cross-framework mapping | Side-by-side comparison table | | General question | Clear concise prose with specific AI RMF category citations (e.g., GOVERN 1.1) | Always cite specific **function + category + subcategory** (e.g., MAP 1.5, MEASURE 2.3, GOVERN 1.1) — not just function names. Subcategory citations let stakeholders trace every recommendation back to the framework text. **Answer-completeness rules (graded details ...

Details

Author
Sushegaad
Repository
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
5 days ago
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

nist-ai-rmf-assessment

Run a gap assessment against the NIST AI Risk Management Framework — GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE — and produce prioritised findings with evidence. Use this whenever NIST AI RMF, AI RMF 1.0, the AI risk management framework, trustworthy AI characteristics, or the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1) comes up; whenever a US-based or federally-connected organisation needs an AI risk assessment; whenever someone asks "how mature is our AI governance?", "what's our AI risk posture?", or "where are the gaps in how we manage AI?"; and whenever a customer, regulator, insurer, or procurement process asks an organisation to demonstrate AI risk management against a recognised framework. Also use it when an organisation wants a voluntary framework to structure AI governance and has not chosen one, since AI RMF is the most common starting point and maps onward to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act.

0 Updated today
PKusch
AI & Automation Listed

nist-ai-rmf-assessment

Run a gap assessment against the NIST AI Risk Management Framework — GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE — and produce prioritised findings with evidence. Use this whenever NIST AI RMF, AI RMF 1.0, the AI risk management framework, trustworthy AI characteristics, or the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1) comes up; whenever a US-based or federally-connected organisation needs an AI risk assessment; whenever someone asks "how mature is our AI governance?", "what's our AI risk posture?", or "where are the gaps in how we manage AI?"; and whenever a customer, regulator, insurer, or procurement process asks an organisation to demonstrate AI risk management against a recognised framework. Also use it when an organisation wants a voluntary framework to structure AI governance and has not chosen one, since AI RMF is the most common starting point and maps onward to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act.

0 Updated 3 days ago
patkusch
AI & Automation Listed

promptfoo-framework-nist-ai-rmf

Test AI systems against the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) with promptfoo. Use when measuring AI risks across the four core functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), testing specific MEASURE categories (safety, security, privacy, fairness, misuse), or demonstrating NIST AI RMF compliance for federal AI guidelines.

3 Updated 1 weeks ago
SoluDevTech