styling-reviewlisted

# Styling Review Review styling for: **$ARGUMENTS** (focus defaults to all) ## Steps 1. **Scan for anti-patterns**: - Inline styles (`style={{}}`) — should be Tailwind classes - CSS modules or styled-components mixed with Tailwind - Hardcoded colors instead of theme tokens (`text-[#333]` → `text-gray-700`) - Arbitrary values (`w-[347px]`) where standard values work (`w-80`) - Duplicate class combinations that should be extracted 2. **Check consistency**: - Spacing scale: are components using consistent spacing? (`p-4` everywhere, not `p-4` and `p-[15px]`) - Typography: consistent font sizes and weights across similar elements - Color usage: semantic colors (`text-primary`, `bg-destructive`) vs raw palette - Border radius: consistent rounding (`rounded-lg` everywhere, not mixed) - Shadow usage: consistent elevation system 3. **Check responsive design**: - Mobile-first approach (base styles = mobile, `sm:` `md:` `lg:` for larger) - No missing breakpoint coverage for layout-critical elements - Text sizes scale appropriately - Touch targets are at least 44x44px on mobile 4. **Check dark mode** (if applicable): - All colors have `dark:` variants - No hardcoded white/black that breaks in dark mode - Images and icons have dark mode alternatives 5. **Performance check**: - No unused Tailwind classes (check with `tailwind-merge` usage) - Complex animations use `will-change` or `transform` for GPU acceleration - Large c