challengelisted

Simulate the lead reviewer's feedback on the current changes. Uses reviewer patterns from the forge analysis. ## Before Starting 1. Read `.context/forge-analysis.md` for reviewer patterns 2. If it doesn't exist, tell the user to run `/claude-army:analyze` first ## Process 1. Run `git status` and `git diff --name-only` to find all changes 2. Read every changed/new file 3. Apply reviewer checks in tier order (Tier 1 first, most likely to be raised) 4. For factual claims (thresholds, tax classification, etc.): WebSearch to verify 5. For source URLs: WebFetch to confirm accessibility ## Output Present findings as the lead reviewer would — questions, not demands: ``` ## Review Simulation: [Reviewer Name] ### Questions (likely to ask) **file:line** — [question in their voice] Fix with: [which agent or direct edit] ### Issues (would flag) **file:line** — [what's wrong] Fix with: [which agent] ### What Looks Good [acknowledge well-done parts] ### Fix Plan | # | Issue | Fix Agent | Instruction | |---|-------|-----------|-------------| | 1 | ... | ... | ... | Execution order: [dependencies] ```