← ClaudeAtlas

stocks-analysislisted

US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger (sentiment, smart money, SEC fundamentals), and reconcile into a verdict with recorded dissents. Structured rubrics keep every number sourced, on any model. Includes five quick data workflows. Read-only. No trading, no purchases, no write operations, no wallet access.
SentiSenseApp/skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 77
Install: claude install-skill SentiSenseApp/skills
# US Stocks Analysis: The Investment Committee - SentiSense > Adversarial investment-committee analysis for US equities. For quick data asks, five expert workflows synthesize price, sentiment, smart money, analyst ratings, and AI insights into terminal-grade briefs. For thesis-grade questions ("should I own NVDA for 3 years?"), the skill convenes a committee of legendary-investor personas that independently research, then attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger, then reconcile into a verdict with recorded dissents. The structure is designed so that even a small local model, following the templates literally, produces grounded, multi-perspective analysis instead of consensus mush. Read-only API. No trading, no purchases, no write operations, no wallet access. **Base URL:** `https://app.sentisense.ai` **Website:** https://sentisense.ai **Full API reference:** https://sentisense.ai/skill.md **Authentication:** API key via `X-SentiSense-API-Key` header. Get a free key at https://app.sentisense.ai/get-api-key --- ## What This Skill Is Two layers, one routing decision per user ask: 1. **Quick Reads.** Five proven data workflows (brief, smart money, divergence, pre-earnings, sector rotation) for questions that want a dense factual answer in five lines. 2. **The Investment Committee.** A structured adversarial debate between investor personas for questions that want judgment: is this thesis sound, what would break it, where do serious people disagree. The co