workflow-upgrade
SolidDeliberate system-improvement loop — audit your own Claude Code setup (rules / memory / skills / MCP / agents / registry), evaluate incoming tools via /vet, adopt the worthwhile ones with discipline (backup → verify), and record every decision. Use when bringing in a tool/idea/collection to improve the setup, or when doing a tooling-improvement pass. Triggers — "upgrade the workflow", "audit our setup", "let's improve the tooling", "evaluate this for us", when handed a post/repo/reel with a tool.
Install
Quality Score: 80/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Sanexxxx777
- Repository
- Sanexxxx777/curated-claude-code
- Created
- 1 months ago
- Last Updated
- 3 days ago
- Language
- N/A
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
upgrade-canary
Re-verify that Claude Code's Workflow-tool runtime still behaves the way the @workflow-toolbox toolkit depends on, after a Claude Code upgrade — and report what changed. Invoke when the user upgraded (or might have upgraded) Claude Code and asks whether the workflow toolkit / committed artifacts still work, when they say "run the upgrade canary", "did the update break the workflows", "re-check the runtime surface", "what changed in the runtime", or before cutting a plugin release. The canary is version-triggered: the full check runs only when the `claude` CLI or the Agent SDK version changed since it last passed (or when forced), so it is cheap to invoke often. It tests TWO runtimes — the user's interactive `claude` binary AND the SDK-bundled one — and reports their version delta + any behavior drift, which can drive fixes or feature work. This is a MAINTAINER tool — it runs against this repo's `toolkit/` dev tree and needs local Claude Code subscription auth; it is not meant for end users who only installed
vet
Evaluate an incoming workflow upgrade — a skill, MCP server, subagent, library, external service, prompt, or pattern — through one disciplined pipeline before adopting it. Security is a blocking gate. Records every verdict so the same thing is never evaluated twice. Use when considering a new tool from a post, repo, or recommendation. Triggers — "vet this", "should we adopt", "is this safe to install", "evaluate this skill/MCP", "what do you think of this tool".
system-health
Preventive hygiene audit of your own Claude Code configuration — memory files, project context (CLAUDE.md), rules, permissions, skills — a deterministic scan of sizes / broken links / stale entries / excessive permissions / junk + interpretation + targeted fixes by agreement. Keeps the setup from rotting before it breaks. Triggers — "check the system", "system health", "workflow hygiene", "what to clean up", "audit memory", "optimize the system".